quote:
Bloodsage thought this was the Ricky Martin Fan Club Forum and wrote:
.Just because 70% of a given population don't like you doesn't mean you should socialize with someone else.
Why because the other 30% doenst matter? How many of that 70% are swayd by your cult of personality?
I stand by the statement if people like you stopped rattling your sabers the majority of the problem would be solved. You force people to focus on the negative and keep at it until others will do or say anything to just make it go away.
Some people are like Slinkys... Not really good for anything, But they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.
quote:
This insanity brought to you by Densetsu:
Over 50 people do, and that's pretty much the majority of active posters around here. Lurkers love to vote without posting for some reason.
Of the 120 posts (prior to this one), there are 47 individual posters. There are more people that want him banned than have posted in this thread.
As a statistical aside:
Of those 120 posts, 13 have come from the person in question (10.83%).
Only other person close to this is Manticore (12 posts). Next closest is Sean with 10, followed by Parce with 6. No-one else has posted more than 4 times.
Cavalier- fucked around with this message on 08-24-2005 at 07:37 PM.
[Edit:] Adjusted figures to take into account post made by subject just before this post hit the board.
quote:
Gadani had this to say about Tron:
So Jackman, what option did you pick?
I went with 1. Yes I could improve, but I still think the majority of the problem is people Like Snugglits who foed me a long time ago and yet manages to post on a regular basis STFU or something else similar its enough to make anyone hate a newbie.
People get tired of seeing the same people shiting in their threads about someone else. They likely could simply ignore the comment but since they are constantly having their face rubbed in the fact person a thinks person B sucks they view Person B as the problem when its really the other way around. A gets everyone sensitive about B and then we have a little poll like this....
Some people are like Slinkys... Not really good for anything, But they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.
quote:
Quoth Jackman:
Why because the other 30% doenst matter? How many of that 70% are swayd by your cult of personality?I stand by the statement if people like you stopped rattling your sabers the majority of the problem would be solved. You force people to focus on the negative and keep at it until others will do or say anything to just make it go away.
Ooh, yeah. So there's 15% who give you the roaring endorsement of, "He's an okay, dude, but I wouldn't miss him if he left." So there's half of this alleged fan-base of yours. Less than one percent of the people around here actually like you, compared to 70% who actively dislike you.
Anything that happens, you've brought on yourself by ignoring friendly advice. And by being irretrievably stupid, but everyone understands that's not your fault. But, simply because there's nothing you can do about being stupid doesn't mean you're no longer responsible for your actions or the impressions you create.
You're the epitome of the saying regarding officers sometimes attributed to Otto von Bismarck:
quote:
There are four types of officers. First, there are the stupid, lazy ones. You should keep them because you always need somebody to do the dirty work, and they won't get in trouble off-duty. Second, there are the stupid, energetic officers. You should get rid of them at all costs, because there's no limit to the damage they can cause. Third, there are the smart, energetic officers. These make the best staff officers. Finally, there are the smart, lazy officers. These should be your commanders.
You're the stupid, energetic type. Nobody cares if stupid people lurk, maybe post an mp3 or so, and post occasionally. You don't seem to be happy unless you've got a metric assload of threads on the front page, in addition to your inane stupidity in other's threads. That's the problem: you're too high-viz for a stupid person. High-profile people need to be witty or funny or wise or entertaining, or some combination thereof.
--Satan, quoted by John Milton
"Don't want to sound like a fanboy, but I am with you. I'll buy it for sure, it's just a matter of for how long I will be playing it..."
- Silvast, Battle.net forums
quote:
Bloodsage stopped staring at Deedlit long enough to write:
You don't seem to be happy unless you've got a metric assload of threads on the front page, in addition to your inane stupidity in other's threads. .
Thats not the case but you will attempt to convince everyone else that it is.
Oh, and before someone mentions that Sage here is on my ignore list. This is a thread with my name on it and also a flame thread. If this was any other thread type I wouldnt bother responding to him or anyone else on the "list"
Some people are like Slinkys... Not really good for anything, But they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.
quote:
Jackman had this to say about John Romero:
A simple like or dislike poll.
It's not something people hear about.
quote:
There was much rejoicing when Snugglits said this:
Manticore, you suck the retard's dick so much... does he ever return for you or something?
Hey snugglits, fuck off. Parce asked for someone to defend him and I felt like debating for awhile.
When was the last time you posted something that wasn't flaming someone that everyone already hates? What's that? You're a little bitch that can only post when he feels like the angry mob is with him? Oh. Sorry.
quote:
Quoth Jackman:
Thats not the case but you will attempt to convince everyone else that it is.Oh, and before someone mentions that Sage here is on my ignore list. This is a thread with my name on it and also a flame thread. If this was any other thread type I wouldnt bother responding to him or anyone else on the "list"
You have 4 threads on the first page alone. Only Kenn has more, and it's actually been a while since he posted this much, whereas yours is pretty standard.
Intelligent people don't walk into a room where they're disliked by 70% or more of the population, and then try to monopolize the conversation.
--Satan, quoted by John Milton
He just comes in and makes some retarded off-hand statement, like: "Well, I guess it'll be awhile before I rape a 10 year-old again ;_;"
That dude reminds me of Kevin from Sin City without the badass ninja factor.
"Don't want to sound like a fanboy, but I am with you. I'll buy it for sure, it's just a matter of for how long I will be playing it..."
- Silvast, Battle.net forums
quote:
Nobody really understood why Mr. Parcelan wrote:
The thing is that Kenn doesn't even have to try to monopolize a thread.He just comes in and makes some retarded off-hand statement, like: "Well, I guess it'll be awhile before I rape a 10 year-old again ;_;"
That dude reminds me of Kevin from Sin City without the badass ninja factor.
I hadn't voted on this thread yet. This post made me remember I need to give it a 5
Anybody disliked by over 70% of the population shouldn't be the 2nd most prolific starter of threads.
--Satan, quoted by John Milton
quote:
Manticore had this to say about John Romero:
Hey snugglits, fuck off. Parce asked for someone to defend him and I felt like debating for awhile.When was the last time you posted something that wasn't flaming someone that everyone already hates? What's that? You're a little bitch that can only post when he feels like the angry mob is with him? Oh. Sorry.
Did you just make that up out of the blue? Because that doesn't sound anything like my posting habits, you moron.
I flame on people because I hate them, not for any other reason. And of course you're going to remember my flames more than my useful posts; I'm one of the few people on the boards who is not so much of a pussy that he either hides all the time or tries to do something like defend the idiot.
As for Somthor's comment, people are definitely not following me in bandwagon-like fashion. If anything, I think most people would be fairly likely to do the opposite of what I do.
quote:
Cavalier- attempted to be funny by writing:
Of the 120 posts (prior to this one), there are 47 individual posters. There are more people that want him banned than have posted in this thread.
As a statistical aside:
Of those 120 posts, 13 have come from the person in question (10.83%).Only other person close to this is Manticore (12 posts). Next closest is Sean with 10, followed by Parce with 6. No-one else has posted more than 4 times.
[Edit:] Adjusted figures to take into account post made by subject just before this post hit the board.
I'm glad someone else did this analysis. I had thought of doing it myself, but laziness prevailed. 
quote:
Bloodsage had this to say about Duck Tales:
You have 4 threads on the first page alone. Only Kenn has more, and it's actually been a while since he posted this much, whereas yours is pretty standard.Intelligent people don't walk into a room where they're disliked by 70% or more of the population, and then try to monopolize the conversation.
You are attempting to make it seem more negative than it is.
I started two threads today
One yesterday
And one the day before.
4 threads in three days is not an attempt at monopolizing. I try to be careful not to start more than 2 threads in any given day. All threads I do start are mostly positive in nature and not Flame threads or threads about myself.
Why dont do something useful like analyze how many posts in total were made and see where I rank for the last 3 days? Subtract the posts made in flame threads.
Or analye who makes the most posts about themselves or what they did are doing.
Some people are like Slinkys... Not really good for anything, But they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.
Why you do it doesn't matter. How often you do it doesn't matter. It's the fact that you're almost universally disliked, yet you start more threads than nearly anyone else.
Edit: word choice. Bloodsage fucked around with this message on 08-24-2005 at 08:46 PM.
--Satan, quoted by John Milton
quote:
Bloodsage had this to say about John Romero:
Why do you think any of that shit matters? The point is, you are the second most prolific starter of threads. In a forum where 70% of the people don't like you. That's not just counterintuitive--it's stupid.Why you do it doesn't matter. How often you do it doesn't matter. It's the fact that you're almost universally disliked, yet you start more threads than nearly anyone else.
Edit: word choice.
I think differently. You are looking over a short period of time and condemning me for making an average of one post per day? Even over this three day time period Im not far and away the most prolific poster.
What was the subject matter of the posts I made? two was about a movie a type of post many people make, one was a link to something I found funny, again thats a common type of post made. The last was a link to a topical story in the news submitted for discussion.
Nothing wrong or unusual with those type posts. More to the point in one of those threads a meaningful dialoge was exchanged.
Again I ask you if you want to talk about who's trying to monopolize the forum count who makes the most posts in a given day not counting flame threads. I bet im not even in the top 10% for the last three days.
Some people are like Slinkys... Not really good for anything, But they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.
quote:
Snugglits had this to say about Optimus Prime:
Did you just make that up out of the blue? Because that doesn't sound anything like my posting habits, you moron.I flame on people because I hate them, not for any other reason. And of course you're going to remember my flames more than my useful posts; I'm one of the few people on the boards who is not so much of a pussy that he either hides all the time or tries to do something like defend the idiot.
As for Somthor's comment, people are definitely not following me in bandwagon-like fashion. If anything, I think most people would be fairly likely to do the opposite of what I do.
quote:
Jackman got all f'ed up on Angel Dust and wrote:
Again I ask you if you want to talk about who's trying to monopolize the forum count who makes the most posts in a given day not counting flame threads. I bet im not even in the top 10% for the last three days.
It's funny because you have a little over twice as many posts as Bloodsage does in this thread. 
quote:
This one time, at Gadani camp:
It's funny because you have a little over twice as many posts as Bloodsage does in this thread.
Yes I do but then this is a flame thread concerning banning me. Naturally I will post here in response to other people posts. Especially when people make statements I feel are false and/or misleading.
Some people are like Slinkys... Not really good for anything, But they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.
quote:
Jackman had this to say about Robocop:
Yes I do but then this is a flame thread concerning banning me. Naturally I will post here in response to other people posts. Especially when people make statements I feel are false and/or misleading.
but you just said you weren't even in the top 10% and youre the top poster for this thread
ok
quote:
Verily, the chocolate bunny rabits doth run and play while Jackman gently hums:
I think differently. You are looking over a short period of time and condemning me for making an average of one post per day? Even over this three day time period Im not far and away the most prolific poster.What was the subject matter of the posts I made? two was about a movie a type of post many people make, one was a link to something I found funny, again thats a common type of post made. The last was a link to a topical story in the news submitted for discussion.
Nothing wrong or unusual with those type posts. More to the point in one of those threads a meaningful dialoge was exchanged.
Again I ask you if you want to talk about who's trying to monopolize the forum count who makes the most posts in a given day not counting flame threads. I bet im not even in the top 10% for the last three days.
Jeebus, but you're an idiot. The point is that over the last several days you have started four times as many threads as the average person here. You're one of only 4 people with more than one thread on the front page. The two posters behind you, combined, have only started one more thread than you. Yet you're probably the least liked person on the forum right now.
What's wrong with this picture?
In a place where 70% of the people are hostile, one shouldn't have a high profile.
--Satan, quoted by John Milton
quote:
The logic train ran off the tracks when Bloodsage said:
Jeebus, but you're an idiot. The point is that over the last several days you have started four times as many threads as the average person here. You're one of only 4 people with more than one thread on the front page. The two posters behind you, combined, have only started one more thread than you.
In a place where 70% of the people are hostile, one shouldn't have a high profile.
Look on page two I have only one post there. I average one thread per day or less. You are deliberately attempting to say something that is not true because it supports your viewpoint.
LIKE I SAID look at the amount of POSTS over the last three days (not counting flame threads)
Some people are like Slinkys... Not really good for anything, But they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.
quote:
Gadani probably says this to all the girls:
but you just said you weren't even in the top 10% and youre the top poster for this threadok
no thats not what I said.
quote:
Again I ask you if you want to talk about who's trying to monopolize the forum count who makes the most posts in a given day not counting flame threads. I bet im not even in the top 10% for the last three days.
Some people are like Slinkys... Not really good for anything, But they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.
quote:
Jackman stopped staring at Deedlit long enough to write:
no thats not what i said
OH. I didn't see that "not counting flame threads". Whoops.
You're still in the top 12 posters, I'd say.
And why would you discount flame threads anyway? They take up just as much space as any other post.
quote:
Gadani had this to say about Reading Rainbow:
OH. I didn't see that "not counting flame threads". Whoops.You're still in the top 12 posters, I'd say.
And why would you discount flame threads anyway? They take up just as much space as any other post.
Because I normally do not post in them. Its a given if two people start arguing about something they will post more than normal. I try to only post in a thread where its of personal interest to me or I have something to contribute in a positive way. The front page is a snap shot of unusual posting activity for me because of the two flame threads.
Last thread I can recall making any where as many posts was one about the theater and I think it went pretty good.
As to where I rank in terms of posting activity (minus flame threads)I don't think anyone is going to look that up because it wont reflect negatively on me.
Just like Bloodsage was quick to say I post too much because of the 4 threads on page one but neglected to ad that I only had one thread on page two. Or that those threads were spread out over 3 days. His intent was to make it appear that I create 4x more threads than just about anyone else every day, which of course is not true. Jackman fucked around with this message on 08-24-2005 at 09:33 PM.
Some people are like Slinkys... Not really good for anything, But they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.
quote:
Quoth Jackman:
Look on page two I have only one post there. I average one thread per day or less. You are deliberately attempting to say something that is not true because it supports your viewpoint.LIKE I SAID look at the amount of POSTS over the last three days (not counting flame threads)
Every word of what I said is 100% true: you start more threads than almost anyone else. It doesn't fucking matter if it's one per minute or one per millenium. The fact is, compared to people who are actually liked, you start more threads than anyone.
One simply doesn't go someplace where one is disliked by 70% of the people present, and try to start more conversations than anyone else.
--Satan, quoted by John Milton
quote:
Bloodsage had this to say about Pirotess:
Every word of what I said is 100% true: you start more threads than almost anyone else. It doesn't fucking matter if it's one per minute or one per millenium. The fact is, compared to people who are actually liked, you start more threads than anyone.One simply doesn't go someplace where one is disliked by 70% of the people present, and try to start more conversations than anyone else.
I bet it's getting pretty tiring having to repeat yourself, huh? 
quote:
Densetsu had this to say about (_|_):
I bet it's getting pretty tiring having to repeat yourself, huh?
What do you expect he is wrong the statisics don't lie. Now he is qualifying it from just any poster to posters who are liked. Well in that case yeah im not well liked so when you look at it in only that way he is correct, otherwise he is not.
He wont stop until I give up or I am banned, and I wont stop defending myself.
For the sake of everyone else though, I will let him get the last word and let it drop if he does.
Some people are like Slinkys... Not really good for anything, But they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.
Like so:
[18:49] * `Doc has joined #rpcrest
[18:49] <`Doc> I need opinions! How many accounts should I use to put Jackman on ignore?
Now if there's anyone who's a bigger pretentious douchebag than Jackman, it has to be Doc.
Thinking about your posts
(and billing you for it) since 2001
quote:
When the babel fish was in place, it was apparent Gydyon said:
I don't like Parcelan so I voted 2
You troll
quote:
`Doc had this to say about (_|_):
I just put him on ignore with my main before asking that, and figured it was the one question worth asking in #rpcrest, where people already don't want me around. Guess I was wrong.
You don't belong in #rpcrest as anything other than a sideshow freak that we kick around when we're bored.
quote:
`Doc had this to say about Duck Tales:
I just put him on ignore with my main before asking that, and figured it was the one question worth asking in #rpcrest, where people already don't want me around. Guess I was wrong.
et tu doc?
Some people are like Slinkys... Not really good for anything, But they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.
quote:
Jackman had this to say about Robocop:
et tu doc?
Being ignored by Doc is like being hated by the kid who doesn't wipe. He's just glad that people have someone to hate more than him.
quote:
Mr. Parcelan had this to say about Pirotess:
You troll
omg sorry
Thinking about your posts
(and billing you for it) since 2001
