EverCrest Message Forums
You are not logged in. Login or Register.
Author
Topic: Gydyon...
Vorbis
Vend-A-Goat
posted 04-16-2002 07:27:10 PM
...or any other well-read (in relation to the Bible, at least) cresteer; Is there a particular book in either of the testaments which describes the ranks of angels and heavenly hierachy? Or is it scattered through-out the whole thing?
Gydyon
Yes, I am a lawyer. No you can't sue them for that. Shut up, or I'll have your legs broken.
posted 04-16-2002 07:35:46 PM
The ranks of angels and heavenly heirarchy is actually more of a held tradition rather than Scriptural.

Gabriel and Michael are the only named angels in Scripture.

However, angels, cherubim, seraphim, etc. are described throughout, particularly in Isaiah, Ezekiel, and Revelations.

Hope that helps.

[ 04-16-2002: Message edited by: Gydyon ]

Gydyon
Evercrest Lawyer

Thinking about your posts
(and billing you for it) since 2001

Trent
Smurfberry Moneyshot
posted 04-16-2002 09:03:09 PM
I gots me a chart that tells me the hierarchy.

Use it to choose names for characters in a pinch.

Cost me $4.50 at some new-age store.

Vorbis
Vend-A-Goat
posted 04-16-2002 09:43:18 PM
quote:
This one time, at Gydyon camp:
The ranks of angels and heavenly heirarchy is actually more of a held tradition rather than Scriptural.

Gabriel and Michael are the only named angels in Scripture.

However, angels, cherubim, seraphim, etc. are described throughout, particularly in Isaiah, Ezekiel, and Revelations.

Hope that helps.



Ah, Thanks! Also, are there any versions of the Bible that you would like to recommend (keep in mind that I am seeking historical accuracy (to early versions of the Bible)); I have recently become interested in the Judeo-Christian types of religions (Christianity, Islam, Judaica) and have finally decided, after all my protest, to read the Bible, as to not be misinformed.

[ 04-16-2002: Message edited by: Dr. Vorbis ]

Emil
Hypersensitive; Beware of Hurt Feelings
posted 04-17-2002 08:24:38 AM
quote:
This insanity brought to you by Gydyon:
The ranks of angels and heavenly heirarchy is actually more of a held tradition rather than Scriptural.

Gabriel and Michael are the only named angels in Scripture.

However, angels, cherubim, seraphim, etc. are described throughout, particularly in Isaiah, Ezekiel, and Revelations.

Hope that helps.



you forgot the Angel Lucifer (The Morning Star), his role changed of course, but he is still a named angel

From a worldly point of view, there is no mistake so great as that of being always right. – Samuel Butler
Maelarr
Pancake
posted 04-17-2002 09:16:43 AM
quote:
Dr. Vorbis stumbled drunkenly to the keyboard and typed:

Ah, Thanks! Also, are there any versions of the Bible that you would like to recommend (keep in mind that I am seeking historical accuracy (to early versions of the Bible)); I have recently become interested in the Judeo-Christian types of religions (Christianity, Islam, Judaica) and have finally decided, after all my protest, to read the Bible, as to not be misinformed.

You want historical accuracy. or easy to read?
King james if you want accuracy.
New international version for easyness.

Tho I use, and Particularly like New king James. Took out all the thees and thou's, and other old english terms. Yet left it for the most part, untouched.
Be sure and read the part about Jesus dieing for your sins too.


All Empires Fall, You just have to know where to push- Me
Cleric Rogue Sigpic
Kaglaaz How'ler
Pancake
posted 04-17-2002 09:25:09 AM
Accuracy? Learn Greek and Hebrew. Some things are just lost in the translations, period.

They all get the Word across. Any more debate on it could easily turn into a slippery slope.

http://www.bloodfin.net
Maelarr
Pancake
posted 04-17-2002 09:32:58 AM
Tru, but some of the other versions are easier to read for those who dont understand Old English. Like I said, I particularly Like New King James. Still sticks to a degree to the origional english translation, but with modern pronouns.

All Empires Fall, You just have to know where to push- Me
Cleric Rogue Sigpic
Gydyon
Yes, I am a lawyer. No you can't sue them for that. Shut up, or I'll have your legs broken.
posted 04-17-2002 10:28:33 AM
For accuracy in translation, King James or new King James.

For a good rendering that has been recently (as in this centruy) translated based on the most recently-discovered documents and the traditional source texts(Dead Sea scrolls and the like), the NIV. It is not a word for word translation however, but is instead concept for concept, so it reads better in English but is not as precise as KJ.

The recent discoveries have not changed anything too much, though -- the older texts discovered were basically the same as the texts previously used.

Gydyon
Evercrest Lawyer

Thinking about your posts
(and billing you for it) since 2001

Vorbis
Vend-A-Goat
posted 04-17-2002 04:56:25 PM
Thanks.
Bloodsage
Heart Attack
posted 04-17-2002 05:56:22 PM
Just a linguistic note: Old English is not "thee" and "thou" and "mayhap, good sir." Were you to see an Old English text, you'd not be able to read it, because it is much closer to its Germanic roots than modern English.

Even Middle English is damned hard to wade through.

You're thinking of Elizabethan or Shakespearean English.

To reign is worth ambition, though in Hell:
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.

--Satan, quoted by John Milton

Arttemis the Rogue
Amethyst's sex toy
posted 04-17-2002 06:01:05 PM
quote:
Bloodsage stumbled drunkenly to the keyboard and typed:
Just a linguistic note: Old English is not "thee" and "thou" and "mayhap, good sir." Were you to see an Old English text, you'd not be able to read it, because it is much closer to its Germanic roots than modern English.

Even Middle English is damned hard to wade through.

You're thinking of Elizabethan or Shakespearean English.


Go Anglo-Saxon!

vertue
Pancake
posted 04-17-2002 06:31:10 PM
I use the New Oxford Annotated Bible, it has a good translation of the meaning, not just the words(and it also has the Deuterocannocals). Also, if you want to get really deep, get a strong's concordance. That way you can look up specific words to see their Greek or Hebrew counterparts and original meaning.

Also get a Commentary.

You could go to www.blueletterbible.com. It has a concordance, several commentaries, and you can look up any scripture you want. It is in KJV but you can always look at the verse in a different translation if you want to.

Archers Roxxors!

Bloodsage
Heart Attack
posted 04-17-2002 07:54:14 PM
quote:
Arttemis the Twink had this to say about dark elf butts:
Go Anglo-Saxon!

Exactly what I was thinking as a great example of Old English.

If you ever get the chance to hear that read by someone who speaks the language, do so. It'll give you goosebumps.

To reign is worth ambition, though in Hell:
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.

--Satan, quoted by John Milton

vertue
Pancake
posted 04-17-2002 07:59:03 PM
Also, if there is anything you want to know about the bible, let me know, I might be able to help. I'm a Bible Scholar Wannabe, and I also have contact with an OT Scholar who is quite knowledgable.

Archers Roxxors!

Chalesm
There is no innuendo in this title.
posted 04-17-2002 08:00:48 PM
quote:
Bloodsage wrote, obviously thinking too hard:
Exactly what I was thinking as a great example of Old English.

If you ever get the chance to hear that read by someone who speaks the language, do so. It'll give you goosebumps.


I did once get to listen to some old english, I got to hear part of Beowulf read in the original old english.

To be honest, I couldn't quite shake the vauge feeling that I was hearing the Swedish chef from the muppets. Of course, I was much younger then, I'd probably appreciate the tonal quality much more now.

In the beginning the Universe was created.
This has made a lot of people angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.

Douglas Adams, 1952-2001

Bloodsage
Heart Attack
posted 04-17-2002 08:07:52 PM
I can see how it could get that way.

When one of my English profs read it, though, he had not only a nice, deep voice, but a flair for dramatic reading that helped a lot.

To reign is worth ambition, though in Hell:
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.

--Satan, quoted by John Milton

Emil
Hypersensitive; Beware of Hurt Feelings
posted 04-17-2002 08:41:38 PM
I know quite a bit about the bible as well, unfortunately what I learned made me leave the faith. Too much knowledge...bit the apple too many times.
From a worldly point of view, there is no mistake so great as that of being always right. – Samuel Butler
Bloodsage
Heart Attack
posted 04-17-2002 08:45:47 PM
That's the funny part about the whole Garden of Eden thing.

Would you take your kids, lock them in a room with toys, but say, "You can play with anything but what's in the toybox in the corner . . ."? The result seems foreordained.

To reign is worth ambition, though in Hell:
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.

--Satan, quoted by John Milton

Emil
Hypersensitive; Beware of Hurt Feelings
posted 04-17-2002 08:51:27 PM
quote:
Bloodsage had this to say about Tron:
That's the funny part about the whole Garden of Eden thing.

Would you take your kids, lock them in a room with toys, but say, "You can play with anything but what's in the toybox in the corner . . ."? The result seems foreordained.


Funny you say that, I was at a sermon once, the pastor said "If Adam didn't bite the apple, I would have."

From a worldly point of view, there is no mistake so great as that of being always right. – Samuel Butler
vertue
Pancake
posted 04-17-2002 08:53:46 PM
quote:
No one really knows why Bloodsage wrote
That's the funny part about the whole Garden of Eden thing.
Would you take your kids, lock them in a room with toys, but say, "You can play with anything but what's in the toybox in the corner . . ."? The result seems foreordained.


You forget one thing. They weren't kids.
The story had more to do with disobeying God anyway than about eating fruit. If it hadn't been the fruit it would have been something else.

Archers Roxxors!

vertue
Pancake
posted 04-17-2002 08:56:15 PM
quote:
No one really understood why Emil wrote
I know quite a bit about the bible as well, unfortunately what I learned made me leave the faith. Too much knowledge...bit the apple too many times.

Courious, what exactly did you learn, and how did you learn it?

Archers Roxxors!

Bloodsage
Heart Attack
posted 04-17-2002 08:58:33 PM
quote:
vertue's unholy Backstreet Boys obsession manifested in:
You forget one thing. They weren't kids.
The story had more to do with disobeying God anyway than about eating fruit. If it hadn't been the fruit it would have been something else.

So, you're saying they weren't innocents? That they were adult, experienced, worldly people?

I hadn't heard that version.

To reign is worth ambition, though in Hell:
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.

--Satan, quoted by John Milton

vertue
Pancake
posted 04-17-2002 09:03:47 PM
quote:
Bloodsage stumbled drunkenly to the keyboard and typed
So, you're saying they weren't innocents? That they were adult, experienced, worldly people?

I hadn't heard that version.


They were adult and experienced yes. Worldly? Depends on what you mean. But they were most likely fully matured physically, mentally, and Spiritually.


And who knows, maybe God wanted them to fall. Makes a much more interesting story than endless days in the Park.

Regardless, the serpent would have found another way to tempt them if the tree were not available. And somethings are much worse than eating forbidden fruit.

Archers Roxxors!

Chalesm
There is no innuendo in this title.
posted 04-17-2002 09:09:15 PM
And aside from the innocent/non-innocent question:

You take a being, you give it free will, a forbidden action, and an infinite amount of time (there was no death in the garden of eden). You were pretty much garunteed from the get-go that something was going to eventually go wrong, if not in a hundred or a thousand years, then in a billion or trillion years. An unpredictable being is eventually going to do something you don't expect.

[ 04-17-2002: Message edited by: Chalesm ]

In the beginning the Universe was created.
This has made a lot of people angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.

Douglas Adams, 1952-2001

Bloodsage
Heart Attack
posted 04-17-2002 09:09:33 PM
I think perhaps we define "experienced" differently.

Having been created fully mature and living in Paradise doesn't fit my notion of an environment that nurtures the skills necessary to resist temptation of any kind.

To reign is worth ambition, though in Hell:
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.

--Satan, quoted by John Milton

Emil
Hypersensitive; Beware of Hurt Feelings
posted 04-17-2002 09:13:12 PM
quote:
vertue wrote this stupid crap:
Courious, what exactly did you learn, and how did you learn it?

Well..that's quite a story, I've been religious most of my life, and have gone from Pentecostal to Jehovah Witness, I took Comparative Religions and The Bible in college, one of my closest friends is a pastor, and he's a bible nut this guy, he loves cults and other religions as well, they fascinate him.

I've actually preached a couple of times, when I was a Baptist, I was also leader of the youth group when I was a teenager in high school.

Basically what I learned is that The Bible is written some 60 years (please correct me, I'm hazy, been a while) after the death of Jesus. It was not written by the apostles, but by 4 priests.

Now, there is a faith component, but you have to believe these 4 men who wrote the bible over a period of a couple of decades anyway (probably much more, but anyway) were divinely inspired by God. It breaks down for me there, the Bible is very political, and has caused a tremendous amount of grief, but also hope I admit.

I think it's inconsistent in places, but we could fight all night about that. People have been fighting for centuries, I just believe what I believe, with the option of changing my mind of course.

This is strictly dealing with the new testament, the old testament is a different creature altogether.

[ 04-17-2002: Message edited by: Emil ]

From a worldly point of view, there is no mistake so great as that of being always right. – Samuel Butler
OtakuPenguin
Peels like a tangerine, but is juicy like an orange.
posted 04-17-2002 09:14:03 PM
quote:
Chalesm wrote this stupid crap:
And aside from the innocent/non-innocent question:

You take a being, you give it free will, a forbidden action, and an infinite amount of time (there was no death in the garden of eden). You were pretty much garunteed from the get-go that something was going to eventually go wrong, if not in a hundred or a thousand years, then in a billion or trillion years. An unpredictable being is eventually going to do something you don't expect.


God had a plan. He knows all, THUS, he knew this was going to happen...think of it this way, got us saved quicker =p

..:: This Is The Sound Of Settling ::..
vertue
Pancake
posted 04-17-2002 09:16:36 PM
Maybe not.

Anyway, since God did give them free will, and is said to be both Omni-potent and Omnicient then he must have known that they would have fallen, and would have had the power to stop it, but didn't. I mean, think, all he had to do was be in the right place at the right time, at any time, and they most likely would have never even considered doing what they did. But he didn't.

So, he let them fall for the Chance to revive them again. Makes a great love story, if you think about it. Sort of anyway.

Archers Roxxors!

OtakuPenguin
Peels like a tangerine, but is juicy like an orange.
posted 04-17-2002 09:19:08 PM
I've read the bible two times. One of those daily bibles. Very cool.

I also know much about my faith and am very religous.

..:: This Is The Sound Of Settling ::..
Bloodsage
Heart Attack
posted 04-17-2002 09:20:01 PM
Free will and omniscience can't exist in the same universe.

But that was a long, multi-page thread from long ago it's too late in the evening to ressurect.

Suffice it to say that if God--or anyone else--can know with 100% certainty what you're going to do, you really have no choice in the matter. Without a finite, positive probability of choosing more than one action, there is no free will.

To reign is worth ambition, though in Hell:
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.

--Satan, quoted by John Milton

Super Kagrama
ROFLELFOLOL!!!11!1 YUO CAN'T RAED MY POSTSSE!@!11
posted 04-17-2002 09:20:27 PM
quote:
A sleep deprived Bloodsage stammered:
So, you're saying they weren't innocents? That they were adult, experienced, worldly people?

The bible doesn't really tell us what age they were in the Garden of Eden. We can only assume that they were adults when this happened, because they gave birth to a child after being exiled.

i shoueld joeg threw the foreast moer offeand!!11
Bloodsage
Heart Attack
posted 04-17-2002 09:21:24 PM
quote:
Kagrama probably says this to all the girls:
The bible doesn't really tell us what age they were in the Garden of Eden. We can only assume that they were adults when this happened, because they gave birth to a child after being exiled.

My point was that they were never children.

To reign is worth ambition, though in Hell:
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.

--Satan, quoted by John Milton

vertue
Pancake
posted 04-17-2002 09:22:38 PM
My Philosophy Professor had a very interesting way of putting it. He said that God knows all of the possibilities that could happen to us, and all the possibilities that could happen for each of those possibilities and so on and such forth.

Archers Roxxors!

Bloodsage
Heart Attack
posted 04-17-2002 09:24:44 PM
That's all well and good, but if he knows the outcome of a given decision point, then there is no free will.
To reign is worth ambition, though in Hell:
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.

--Satan, quoted by John Milton

Emil
Hypersensitive; Beware of Hurt Feelings
posted 04-17-2002 09:25:04 PM
quote:
Bloodsage said this about your mom:
Free will and omniscience can't exist in the same universe.

But that was a long, multi-page thread from long ago it's too late in the evening to ressurect.

Suffice it to say that if God--or anyone else--can know with 100% certainty what you're going to do, you really have no choice in the matter. Without a finite, positive probability of choosing more than one action, there is no free will.


Didn't the Calvinists believe that? Only 10% was going to heaven? It didn't matter what you did, but be good, cause you might go.

From a worldly point of view, there is no mistake so great as that of being always right. – Samuel Butler
Super Kagrama
ROFLELFOLOL!!!11!1 YUO CAN'T RAED MY POSTSSE!@!11
posted 04-17-2002 09:27:31 PM
quote:
Bloodsage had this to say about pies:
That's all well and good, but if he knows the outcome of a given decision point, then there is no free will.

It just means he can see the future. Right now, what we do is basically free will. Moving our hands, typing, eating something, is free will.

God is just, well, God, and knows what's going to happen.

(Hope I got that right, bleh.)

i shoueld joeg threw the foreast moer offeand!!11
Bloodsage
Heart Attack
posted 04-17-2002 09:30:02 PM
Think about it, though: if he knows the future, you really don't have any free will of any kind. How can you really say you "chose" action A or action B, if the outcome is already known?
To reign is worth ambition, though in Hell:
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.

--Satan, quoted by John Milton

vertue
Pancake
posted 04-17-2002 09:30:49 PM
Actually, I would think that we would only lose our free will if God chose to intervene every time we tried to do something that he didn't want us too.

I'm not sure if there is really such a thing as total and complete free will anyway.

Archers Roxxors!

Bloodsage
Heart Attack
posted 04-17-2002 09:31:44 PM
quote:
When the babel fish was in place, it was apparent Emil said:
Didn't the Calvinists believe that? Only 10% was going to heaven? It didn't matter what you did, but be good, cause you might go.


Yeah the Calvinists believed one's entry into Heaven was predetermined. They acted all goody-goody, not in hopes of influencing Fate, but as a way to show their neighbors that they were obviously of the chosen.

To reign is worth ambition, though in Hell:
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.

--Satan, quoted by John Milton

All times are US/Eastern
Hop To: