quote:
Atrocities in Iraq: 'I killed innocent people for our government'
By Paul Rockwell -- Special to The BeeFor nearly 12 years, Staff Sgt. Jimmy Massey was a hard-core, some say gung-ho, Marine. For three years he trained fellow Marines in one of the most grueling indoctrination rituals in military life - Marine boot camp.
The Iraq war changed Massey. The brutality, the sheer carnage of the U.S. invasion, touched his conscience and transformed him forever. He was honorably discharged with full severance last Dec. 31 and is now back in his hometown, Waynsville, N.C.
When I talked with Massey last week, he expressed his remorse at the civilian loss of life in incidents in which he himself was involved.
Q: You spent 12 years in the Marines. When were you sent to Iraq?
A: I went to Kuwait around Jan. 17. I was in Iraq from the get-go. And I was involved in the initial invasion.
Q: What does the public need to know about your experiences as a Marine?
A: The cause of the Iraqi revolt against the American occupation. What they need to know is we killed a lot of innocent people. I think at first the Iraqis had the understanding that casualties are a part of war. But over the course of time, the occupation hurt the Iraqis. And I didn't see any humanitarian support.
Q: What experiences turned you against the war and made you leave the Marines?
A: I was in charge of a platoon that consists of machine gunners and missile men. Our job was to go into certain areas of the towns and secure the roadways. There was this one particular incident - and there's many more - the one that really pushed me over the edge. It involved a car with Iraqi civilians. From all the intelligence reports we were getting, the cars were loaded down with suicide bombs or material. That's the rhetoric we received from intelligence. They came upon our checkpoint. We fired some warning shots. They didn't slow down. So we lit them up.
Q: Lit up? You mean you fired machine guns?
A: Right. Every car that we lit up we were expecting ammunition to go off. But we never heard any. Well, this particular vehicle we didn't destroy completely, and one gentleman looked up at me and said: "Why did you kill my brother? We didn't do anything wrong." That hit me like a ton of bricks.
Q: He spoke English?
A: Oh, yeah.
Q: Baghdad was being bombed. The civilians were trying to get out, right?
A: Yes. They received pamphlets, propaganda we dropped on them. It said, "Just throw up your hands, lay down weapons." That's what they were doing, but we were still lighting them up. They weren't in uniform. We never found any weapons.
Q: You got to see the bodies and casualties?
A: Yeah, firsthand. I helped throw them in a ditch.
Q: Over what period did all this take place?
A: During the invasion of Baghdad.
'We lit him up pretty good'Q: How many times were you involved in checkpoint "light-ups"?
A: Five times. There was [the city of] Rekha. The gentleman was driving a stolen work utility van. He didn't stop. With us being trigger happy, we didn't really give this guy much of a chance. We lit him up pretty good. Then we inspected the back of the van. We found nothing. No explosives.Q: The reports said the cars were loaded with explosives. In all the incidents did you find that to be the case?
A: Never. Not once. There were no secondary explosions. As a matter of fact, we lit up a rally after we heard a stray gunshot.
Q: A demonstration? Where?
A: On the outskirts of Baghdad. Near a military compound. There were demonstrators at the end of the street. They were young and they had no weapons. And when we rolled onto the scene, there was already a tank that was parked on the side of the road. If the Iraqis wanted to do something, they could have blown up the tank. But they didn't. They were only holding a demonstration. Down at the end of the road, we saw some RPGs (rocket-propelled grenades) lined up against the wall. That put us at ease because we thought: "Wow, if they were going to blow us up, they would have done it."
Q: Were the protest signs in English or Arabic?
A: Both.
Q: Who gave the order to wipe the demonstrators out?
A: Higher command. We were told to be on the lookout for the civilians because a lot of the Fedayeen and the Republican Guards had tossed away uniforms and put on civilian clothes and were mounting terrorist attacks on American soldiers. The intelligence reports that were given to us were basically known by every member of the chain of command. The rank structure that was implemented in Iraq by the chain of command was evident to every Marine in Iraq. The order to shoot the demonstrators, I believe, came from senior government officials, including intelligence communities within the military and the U.S. government.
Q: What kind of firepower was employed?
A: M-16s, 50-cal. machine guns.
Q: You fired into six or ten kids? Were they all taken out?
A: Oh, yeah. Well, I had a "mercy" on one guy. When we rolled up, he was hiding behind a concrete pillar. I saw him and raised my weapon up, and he put up his hands. He ran off. I told everybody, "Don't shoot." Half of his foot was trailing behind him. So he was running with half of his foot cut off.
Q: After you lit up the demonstration, how long before the next incident?
A: Probably about one or two hours. This is another thing, too. I am so glad I am talking with you, because I suppressed all of this.
Q: Well, I appreciate you giving me the information, as hard as it must be to recall the painful details.
A: That's all right. It's kind of therapy for me. Because it's something that I had repressed for a long time.
Q: And the incident?
A: There was an incident with one of the cars. We shot an individual with his hands up. He got out of the car. He was badly shot. We lit him up. I don't know who started shooting first. One of the Marines came running over to where we were and said: "You all just shot a guy with his hands up." Man, I forgot about this.
Depleted uranium and cluster bombs
Q: You mention machine guns. What can you tell me about cluster bombs, or depleted uranium?
A: Depleted uranium. I know what it does. It's basically like leaving plutonium rods around. I'm 32 years old. I have 80 percent of my lung capacity. I ache all the time. I don't feel like a healthy 32-year-old.Q: Were you in the vicinity of of depleted uranium?
A: Oh, yeah. It's everywhere. DU is everywhere on the battlefield. If you hit a tank, there's dust.
Q: Did you breath any dust?
A: Yeah.
Q: And if DU is affecting you or our troops, it's impacting Iraqi civilians.
A: Oh, yeah. They got a big wasteland problem.
Q: Do Marines have any precautions about dealing with DU?
A: Not that I know of. Well, if a tank gets hit, crews are detained for a little while to make sure there are no signs or symptoms. American tanks have depleted uranium on the sides, and the projectiles have DU in them. If an enemy vehicle gets hit, the area gets contaminated. Dead rounds are in the ground. The civilian populace is just now starting to learn about it. Hell, I didn't even know about DU until two years ago. You know how I found out about it? I read an article in Rolling Stone magazine. I just started inquiring about it, and I said "Holy s---!"
Q: Cluster bombs are also controversial. U.N. commissions have called for a ban. Were you acquainted with cluster bombs?
A: I had one of my Marines in my battalion who lost his leg from an ICBM.
Q: What's an ICBM?
A: A multi-purpose cluster bomb.
Q: What happened?
A: He stepped on it. We didn't get to training about clusters until about a month before I left.
Q: What kind of training?
A: They told us what they looked like, and not to step on them.
Q: Were you in any areas where they were dropped?
A: Oh, yeah. They were everywhere.
Q: Dropped from the air?
A: From the air as well as artillery.
Q: Are they dropped far away from cities, or inside the cities?
A: They are used everywhere. Now if you talked to a Marine artillery officer, he would give you the runaround, the politically correct answer. But for an average grunt, they're everywhere.
Q: Including inside the towns and cities?
A: Yes, if you were going into a city, you knew there were going to be ICBMs.
Q: Cluster bombs are anti-personnel weapons. They are not precise. They don't injure buildings, or hurt tanks. Only people and living things. There are a lot of undetonated duds and they go off after the battles are over.
A: Once the round leaves the tube, the cluster bomb has a mind of its own. There's always human error. I'm going to tell you: The armed forces are in a tight spot over there. It's starting to leak out about the civilian casualties that are taking place. The Iraqis know. I keep hearing reports from my Marine buddies inside that there were 200-something civilians killed in Fallujah. The military is scrambling right now to keep the raps on that. My understanding is Fallujah is just littered with civilian bodies.
Embedded reporters
Q: How are the embedded reporters responding?
A: I had embedded reporters in my unit, not my platoon. One we had was a South African reporter. He was scared s---less. We had an incident where one of them wanted to go home.Q: Why?
A: It was when we started going into Baghdad. When he started seeing the civilian casualties, he started wigging out a little bit. It didn't start until we got on the outskirts of Baghdad and started taking civilian casualties.
Q: I would like to go back to the first incident, when the survivor asked why did you kill his brother. Was that the incident that pushed you over the edge, as you put it?
A: Oh, yeah. Later on I found out that was a typical day. I talked with my commanding officer after the incident. He came up to me and says: "Are you OK?" I said: "No, today is not a good day. We killed a bunch of civilians." He goes: "No, today was a good day." And when he said that, I said "Oh, my goodness, what the hell am I into?"
Q: Your feelings changed during the invasion. What was your state of mind before the invasion?
A: I was like every other troop. My president told me they got weapons of mass destruction, that Saddam threatened the free world, that he had all this might and could reach us anywhere. I just bought into the whole thing.
Q: What changed you?
A: The civilian casualties taking place. That was what made the difference. That was when I changed.
Q: Did the revelations that the government fabricated the evidence for war affect the troops?
A: Yes. I killed innocent people for our government. For what? What did I do? Where is the good coming out of it? I feel like I've had a hand in some sort of evil lie at the hands of our government. I just feel embarrassed, ashamed about it.
Showdown with superiors
Q: I understand that all the incidents - killing civilians at checkpoints, itchy fingers at the rally - weigh on you. What happened with your commanding officers? How did you deal with them?
A: There was an incident. It was right after the fall of Baghdad, when we went back down south. On the outskirts of Karbala, we had a morning meeting on the battle plan. I was not in a good mindset. All these things were going through my head - about what we were doing over there. About some of the things my troops were asking. I was holding it all inside. My lieutenant and I got into a conversation. The conversation was striking me wrong. And I lashed out. I looked at him and told him: "You know, I honestly feel that what we're doing is wrong over here. We're committing genocide."
He asked me something and I said that with the killing of civilians and the depleted uranium we're leaving over here, we're not going to have to worry about terrorists. He didn't like that. He got up and stormed off. And I knew right then and there that my career was over. I was talking to my commanding officer.
Q: What happened then?
A: After I talked to the top commander, I was kind of scurried away. I was basically put on house arrest. I didn't talk to other troops. I didn't want to hurt them. I didn't want to jeopardize them.
I want to help people. I felt strongly about it. I had to say something. When I was sent back to stateside, I went in front of the sergeant major. He's in charge of 3,500-plus Marines. "Sir," I told him, "I don't want your money. I don't want your benefits. What you did was wrong."
It was just a personal conviction with me. I've had an impeccable career. I chose to get out. And you know who I blame? I blame the president of the U.S. It's not the grunt. I blame the president because he said they had weapons of mass destruction. It was a lie.
Yes, I know there will be civilian casualities in war. I'm not saying anything else. I can understand shooting at a car that won't stop at a roadblock, because how are you supposed to know it's just civilians. But there are things in this interview that are just plain disgusting to read. Zaza fucked around with this message on 05-18-2004 at 10:12 AM.
quote:
Nina had this to say about Reading Rainbow:
Now expect every conservative trying to disprove it, uttering cries of dismay when they realize it's true, then start blaming the guy for being a deserter.
I'm more expecting nitpicking on things like the cars not stopping on the roadblocks, while ignoring the rest of it.
But for instance he says a friend of his lost his leg to an ICBM. Well his friend is pretty F-ing lucky then because an ICBM is an intercontinental Ballistic Missile holding multiple Nuclear Warheads. He says they are cluster bombs..
Best Cluster Bombs don't go off when you step on them. They explode above the ground or upon contact. Sure there are Duds. But not as many as this guy claims.
Not to mention that his knowledge of DU is nothing more than what you read about in exaggerated stories in the papers and Magazines. Every soldier I have talked to said they were fully briefed on DU, the real dangers and the truth of it. This guy claims to have no knowledge.
quote:
Nina stopped beating up furries long enough to write:
Now expect every conservative trying to disprove it, uttering cries of dismay when they realize it's true, then start blaming the guy for being a deserter.
I find your comments particularly ironic, given that you crop up as a talking head babbling out your ass in a lot of threads before any of the "Heavy Duty" conservatives show up.
sigpic courtesy of This Guy, original modified by me
quote:
Azizza painfully thought these words up:
Not to mention that his knowledge of DU is nothing more than what you read about in exaggerated stories in the papers and Magazines. Every soldier I have talked to said they were fully briefed on DU, the real dangers and the truth of it. This guy claims to have no knowledge.
But he's a Marine!! And he read about it in Rolling Stone! Obviously he's more qualified to discuss it than you.
quote:
So quoth Zaza:
I'm more expecting nitpicking on things like the cars not stopping on the roadblocks, while ignoring the rest of it.
Nitpicking? Is that what you call it when we say this guy is wrong, an idiot and probably a lier.
All I saw in this story was a guy whining and crying about how evil the troops are and how we are killing the poor innocent Iraqi people. He doesn't even know his facts.
And show me what is "true" in there Nina. That people who ran Roadblocks got killed? Well no shit. They were warned.
That there were some civilian Casualties? Welcome to war. We have bent over backwards to lower the number of civilians killed. Even going so far as to put our own people in danger. But that isnt' enough for some people.
This guy accuses us of Genocide. Sorry but that pretty much takes any shred of Credibility he had. If what he actually did is true then he is guilty of insubordination at the very least. Sounds to me like he is either
A: A liar who was never in the service and never in Iraq.
or
B: A guy who has an Ax to grind and is making shit up and blowing other things out of proportion.
Damn. Sounds like a young John Kerry to me.
quote:
Azizza had this to say about (_|_):
Nitpicking? Is that what you call it when we say this guy is wrong, an idiot and probably a lier.All I saw in this story was a guy whining and crying about how evil the troops are and how we are killing the poor innocent Iraqi people. He doesn't even know his facts.
And show me what is "true" in there Nina. That people who ran Roadblocks got killed? Well no shit. They were warned.
That there were some civilian Casualties? Welcome to war. We have bent over backwards to lower the number of civilians killed. Even going so far as to put our own people in danger. But that isnt' enough for some people.
This guy accuses us of Genocide. Sorry but that pretty much takes any shred of Credibility he had. If what he actually did is true then he is guilty of insubordination at the very least. Sounds to me like he is either
A: A liar who was never in the service and never in Iraq.
or
B: A guy who has an Ax to grind and is making shit up and blowing other things out of proportion.Damn. Sounds like a young John Kerry to me.
It's very hard to defend you when you make cracks like that last one, Az
sigpic courtesy of This Guy, original modified by me
quote:
Ja'Deth Issar Ka'bael had this to say about the Spice Girls:
It's very hard to defend you when you make cracks like that last one, Az
SOmeone has to offset the constant Cracks against Bush
And anyway. this guys does come off a lot like Kerry. *shrugs*
But what of things like firing into that crowd? If it's true it's reprehensible. If it's a lie, well, shrug. I can't argue wheter it's truth or lie, because I can't possibly know that. I can just say that it doesn't seem too much of a fantasy, considering how these exact things have happened in past wars, and the torture surfacing.
He could be a liar. But assuming everything that's uncomfortable and unlikely to you to be a lie is not a very admirable set of mind.
Peter fucked around with this message on 05-18-2004 at 11:16 AM.
quote:
Ja'Deth Issar Ka'bael had this to say about Reading Rainbow:
I find your comments particularly ironic, given that you crop up as a talking head babbling out your ass in a lot of threads before any of the "Heavy Duty" conservatives show up.
You see, I don't really for political debate, because it's always one-sided. Democrats hold democrat opinions, conservatives hold conservative opinions, and that's all there is to those. Same old debates are so played out that any third party can just predict the arguments and laugh. Which is precisely what I'm doing, and looks like my predictions weren't too far off! But Azizza is probably right in this case.
However, that still doesn't justify any of the invasion, nor the history your country has for it, so you, my fine, rudeass sir, can go to hell.
Katrinity fucked around with this message on 05-18-2004 at 11:30 AM.
quote:
Nina had this to say about Pirotess:
However, that still doesn't justify any of the invasion, nor the history your country has for it, so you, my fine, rudeass sir, can go to hell.
You... are a moron.
quote:
Faelynn LeAndris had this to say about Captain Planet:
You... are a moron.
Am I? Just frustrated you never found WMDs to put in your backyard? Or still bitter about the obvious transgressions of your own Monroe doctrine? Nina fucked around with this message on 05-18-2004 at 11:37 AM.
quote:
Katrinity had this to say about (_|_):
I say next we invade Canada. We have to prevent a repeat of the French-Indian War where the French Canadians invaded the Ohio Valley!
We do need to invade Canada, but that's not why. If they ever attacked us, it would be nigh-impossible to get reinforcements because no commander will believe it.
General: "Call the Joint Chiefs! The Canadian Army is advancing! They've crossed the border and are setting fire to Montana!"
Joint Chiefs: BWAHAHA!! Good one man! Thanks, I needed a good joke to make my day. Take care.
quote:
Sakkra enlisted the help of an infinite number of monkeys to write:
We do need to invade Canada, but that's not why. If they ever attacked us, it would be nigh-impossible to get reinforcements because no commander will believe it.General: "Call the Joint Chiefs! The Canadian Army is advancing! They've crossed the border and are setting fire to Montana!"
Joint Chiefs: BWAHAHA!! Good one man! Thanks, I needed a good joke to make my day. Take care.
I was kinda trying to stay away from the obvious "Canada has an army? Bwhahahaha!" jokes. I was pointing out Canada isn't some pristine land that has never had asperations of conquest
quote:
Nina spewed forth this undeniable truth:
Am I? Just frustrated you never found WMDs to put in your backyard? Or still bitter about the obvious transgressions of your own Monroe doctrine?
Again, a moron.. And what does bringing up the Monroe Doctrine have to do anything concidering it was a statment made to ward off European influences from taking over more of the North AMERICAN continent, not us invading and taking away from anyone else. Something made in responce to Russia's increased influence in the California's and the west coast, and the FRENCH coming from the North in Canada. Oh, and it only came ABout because of disputes between the Spanish and the FRENCH working out of CANADA to improve influence in North AMERICA.
As far as the WMD, I couldn't give a rat's ass. The middle east is a sesspool. Plain and simple. Not nessesarily all of it's people, but a vast majority. It is a matter of jealousy in human nature plain and simple. Its like Poor versus the Rich in human nature, Poor people hate Rich people for what they have, same as the middle east. They hate the US because of what we have compared to thier struggling and shitty way of life. At least thats MY opinion on thier hatred. REgardless, I think they should have been elimnated in the 70's, I have no qualms about it happening now. Faelynn LeAndris fucked around with this message on 05-18-2004 at 11:48 AM.
quote:
Nina had this to say about the Spice Girls:
Am I? Just frustrated you never found WMDs to put in your backyard? Or still bitter about the obvious transgressions of your own Monroe doctrine?
So the mass graves wern't justification enough? Or is it the morally right thing to let a people be slaughtered.?
I can't really say that I trust this article either way, but if it's true... oh man...
edit: (I stand corrected! ICBM also stands for International Collectibles, Belts and Militaria and International Consortium for Brain Mapping ) Kegwen fucked around with this message on 05-18-2004 at 11:49 AM.
quote:
ACES! Another post by Naimah:
So the mass graves wern't justification enough? Or is it the morally right thing to let a people be slaughtered.?
Hi.
Iraq wasn't invaded to liberate the poor, oppressed people, or there would be american invasions of worse countries such as Sudan.
quote:
Check out the big brain on Naimah!
So the mass graves wern't justification enough? Or is it the morally right thing to let a people be slaughtered.?
The fact that he brought up an American policy made in responce to French, French Canadian, and other European influences with invasion hunger pretty much disputes his standpoint.
quote:
Faelynn LeAndris had this to say about (_|_):
Again, a moron.. And what does bringing up the Monroe Doctrine have to do anything concidering it was a statment made to ward off European influences from taking over more of the North AMERICAN continent, not us invading and taking away from anyone else. Something made in responce to Russia's increased influence in the California's and the west coast, and the FRENCH coming from the North in Canada. Oh, and it only came ABout because of disputes between the Spanish and the FRENCH working out of CANADA to improve influence in North AMERICA.As far as the WMD, I couldn't give a rat's ass. The middle east is a sesspool. Plain and simple. Not nessesarily all of it's people, but a vast majority. It is a matter of jealousy in human nature plain and simple. Its like Poor versus the Rich in human nature, Poor people hate Rich people for what they have, same as the middle east. They hate the US because of what we have compared to thier struggling and shitty way of life. At least thats MY opinion on thier hatred. REgardless, I think they should have been elimnated in the 70's, I have no qualms about it happening now.
So what you're saying is that based on your ill-informed broad generalization of the middle east, everyone in the region deserves to die or something?
You go girl.
quote:
ACES! Another post by Zaza:
Hi.Iraq wasn't invaded to liberate the poor, oppressed people, or there would be american invasions of worse countries such as Sudan.
As soon as Africans start ramming plains into buildings then we can blow their shit up as well.
When it comes down to it, Iraq needed to be taken care of for a multitude of reasons.
quote:
Zaza thought about the meaning of life:
Hi.Iraq wasn't invaded to liberate the poor, oppressed people, or there would be american invasions of worse countries such as Sudan.
It was vengeance, plain and simple. Even I'll admit to that. Someone had to take the blame and suffer the consequences for a blow to the US. The locational origin of the perpetrators was all the just cause needed to pick who was going to take the fall, especially with a previous history of such attacks and terrorism hanging over thier heads. Again, no qualms with that. At the worst, it doesn't get rid of the ratholers and terrorists, and the best it shows we aren't entirely afraid of fighting back regardless of popular opinion (Which was hugely against the effort from the start.) Before the US had a very, not pacifist but, not wanting to get thier hands dirty at the expence of International Diplomacy, when it came to dealing with these issues. Terrorist's kinda got comfy knowing the US wouldn't really retaliate as long as it would severly damage thier international standing, so they had no real fears. That is no longer the case. The US fought back. Maybe not the best choice, but not letting ourselves be bullied because of internation opinion, was a start.
Really though, I'm in the school of thought that while we've done some good things (removing a totalitarian dictator) in Iraq, we've also done some pretty bone-headed things. Our soldiers have grown tired and depressed from all the killing and living in a warzone. We need to get done with the hand over of power and get them the heck out of there as soon as possible for some rest. If the Iraqi people screw themselves over after the fact, thats their problem. They were given a chance to decide their own fates.
quote:
Naimah had this to say about Jimmy Carter:
As soon as Africans start ramming plains into buildings then we can blow their shit up as well.When it comes down to it, Iraq needed to be taken care of for a multitude of reasons.
Except that Al-Qaeda was never linked to Iraq. So you might as well go after Sudan.
Didn't you say the mass graves were the justification, not the terrorism, anyways? Are you going to ever stop jumping from excuse to excuse?
quote:
The logic train ran off the tracks when Sakkra said:
....
General: "Call the Joint Chiefs! The Canadian Army is advancing! They've crossed the border and are setting fire to Montana!"Joint Chiefs: BWAHAHA!! Good one man! Thanks, I needed a good joke to make my day. Take care.
Dude, the canucks wouldn't get that far, well they might get a bit into the state, since there is like nobody around, but once found, the People of Montana would go to town on them. Like everyone born in the state is given a shotgun and a Bigass Elk rifle on birth, My God they would shoot the yacks right out from under those crazy canucks
quote:
Zaza had this to say about (_|_):
Except that Al-Qaeda was never linked to Iraq. So you might as well go after Sudan.Didn't you say the mass graves were the justification, not the terrorism, anyways? Are you going to ever stop jumping from excuse to excuse?
I believe his mass graves comment was LINKED to the terrorism since it was the terrorist act of blowing up the towers that amassed the graves.
quote:
Faelynn LeAndris wrote, obviously thinking too hard:
It was vengeance, plain and simple. Even I'll admit to that. Someone had to take the blame and suffer the consequences for a blow to the US. The locational origin of the perpetrators was all the just cause needed to pick who was going to take the fall, especially with a previous history of such attacks and terrorism hanging over thier heads. Again, no qualms with that. At the worst, it doesn't get rid of the ratholers and terrorists, and the best it shows we aren't entirely afraid of fighting back regardless of popular opinion (Which was hugely against the effort from the start.) Before the US had a very, not pacifist but, not wanting to get thier hands dirty at the expence of International Diplomacy, when it came to dealing with these issues. Terrorist's kinda got comfy knowing the US wouldn't really retaliate as long as it would severly damage thier international standing, so they had no real fears. That is no longer the case. The US fought back. Maybe not the best choice, but not letting ourselves be bullied because of internation opinion, was a start.
This is hilarious. So vengeance is always justifiable, no matter how horribly it misses its target? And any amount of casualties of completely innocent people is acceptable as long as you get to feel that you fought back?
If a guy that lived in your neighbourhood shot my brother, and I carpet bombed the area where he lives, wiping out your family, would you praise me for not getting bullied by common sense and laws? Or are you just going to fall back on the good old excuse of middle eastern people all being terrorists and deserving to die?
quote:
Verily, Faelynn LeAndris doth proclaim:
I believe his mass graves comment was LINKED to the terrorism since it was the terrorist act of blowing up the towers that amassed the graves.
He was talking about what Saddam was doing to his own people.
quote:
Faelynn LeAndris had this to say about dark elf butts:
I believe his mass graves comment was LINKED to the terrorism since it was the terrorist act of blowing up the towers that amassed the graves.
I'm pretty sure he was talking about the mass graves in Iraq.
quote:
Zaza had this to say about the Spice Girls:
This is hilarious. So vengeance is always justifiable, no matter how horribly it misses its target? And any amount of casualties of completely innocent people is acceptable as long as you get to feel that you fought back?If a guy that lived in your neighbourhood shot my brother, and I carpet bombed the area where he lives, wiping out your family, would you praise me for not getting bullied by common sense and laws? Or are you just going to fall back on the good old excuse of middle eastern people all being terrorists and deserving to die?
However fun carpet bombing the entire Middle East would be, it hasn't been done yet.
quote:
Zaza stumbled drunkenly to the keyboard and typed:
I'm pretty sure he was talking about the mass graves in Iraq.
And I'm pretty sure you didn't read the second line of my post.
quote:
Naimah had this to say about the Spice Girls:
However fun carpet bombing the entire Middle East would be, it hasn't been done yet.
Check Fae's post. He was advocating "taking out" the Middle east. That's what I replied to.
quote:
From the book of Naimah, chapter 3, verse 16:
And I'm pretty sure you didn't read the second line of my post.
I did. But it was utterly irrelevant. The Iraq war had nothing to do with saving civilians, and there were way better targets you could hit if you wanted to save civilians, targets that would offer much less resistance and be much more suspectible to rebuild.
So again, what's your point?
quote:
Zaza wrote this then went back to looking for porn:
Check Fae's post. He was advocating "taking out" the Middle east. That's what I replied to.
Taking out is different then carpet bombing. Taking out, is what we did to Iraq.
quote:
Zaza had this to say about Robocop:
I'm pretty sure he was talking about the mass graves in Iraq.
Ah-ha, beat Zaza to it