Download your copy from here (1,671K).
Unzip it all into the same directory, then run the battleperf.exe program. Let it do its thing, then copy and paste the results window that will pop up after the test is complete as a reply to this thread.
(Also, post your CPU type/speed, your OS, and how much memory you have. I forgot to add that stuff into the report the performance test gives.) [ 10-16-2002: Message edited by: Drysart ]
omg perfortesting lolrofl
Let me reboot and see if/how they change.
Editx2: Rebooted.
Resolution 320x240:
30 Objects: 52 iterations
60 Objects: 30 iterations
90 Objects: 22 iterations
120 Objects: 17 iterations
Resolution 640x480:
30 Objects: 51 iterations
60 Objects: 30 iterations
90 Objects: 22 iterations
120 Objects: 17 iterations
Resolution 960x720:
30 Objects: 49 iterations
60 Objects: 30 iterations
90 Objects: 21 iterations
120 Objects: 17 iterations
Test complete.
Athlon XP 1700, Radeon 8500, 256 SD-RAM, Win 98se [ 10-16-2002: Message edited by: Black Mage ]
.png)
I have a crappy computer 
Resolution 320x240:
30 Objects: 58 iterations
60 Objects: 29 iterations
90 Objects: 20 iterations
120 Objects: 15 iterations
Resolution 640x480:
30 Objects: 50 iterations
60 Objects: 27 iterations
90 Objects: 19 iterations
120 Objects: 15 iterations
Resolution 960x720:
30 Objects: 46 iterations
60 Objects: 26 iterations
90 Objects: 18 iterations
120 Objects: 14 iterations
Test complete.
Thank you, Dave.
... OH, yeah. AMD athlon 1.01 Ghz 768 meg ram. [ 10-16-2002: Message edited by: Gikkwiny ]
quote:
Just Nwist wrote, obviously thinking too hard:
Can we get an estimate as to when a Beta might be out?
When it's done. I was hoping for this weekend but I ended up spending the past two days wrestling with a graphic problem I didn't expect.
Borland Delphi rules.
Resolution 320x240:
30 Objects: 40 iterations
60 Objects: 18 iterations
90 Objects: 14 iterations
120 Objects: 11 iterations
Resolution 640x480:
30 Objects: 40 iterations
60 Objects: 22 iterations
90 Objects: 15 iterations
120 Objects: 11 iterations
Resolution 960x720:
30 Objects: 36 iterations
60 Objects: 20 iterations
90 Objects: 14 iterations
120 Objects: 11 iterations
Test complete.
Athlon T-bird 1.3GHz [ 10-16-2002: Message edited by: Skaw ]
384 SDRAM
Hercules GeForce 3 with 30.82 drivers
Windows 98SE
And why is is leaving an 8mb process after program termination?
Edit: P4 1.8a (running at 2.4), 512Mb 133 RAM, GF4 4400 128Mb, Win2k SP2 [ 10-16-2002: Message edited by: Random Insanity Generator ]
~750MHz P3 Win98SE [ 10-16-2002: Message edited by: Densetsu ]
512MB RAM
521 RAM [ 10-16-2002: Message edited by: Just Nwist ]
2 Gig
Windows XP
ALSO: CTRL-ALT-DELETE shows that the download's process is still running. [ 10-16-2002: Message edited by: Black Mage ]
Athlon 1000 or so, Geforce 4 Ti 4200
i need more RAM.
Intel Celeron Tualatin 1200 MHz WinXP Radeon... some Radeon card I can't recall that kinda sucks. I'll test this tomorrow on ze better computer.
quote:
We were all impressed when Random Insanity Generator wrote:
And why is is leaving an 8mb process after program termination?
Good question.
Kill it after the test is done.
No real big changes after rebooting and running the test without a billion other programs in the background.
P4 2gHz, GeF4Ti 4400 128mb, WinME (shoot me now please), 512mb ram. [ 10-16-2002: Message edited by: Xyrra ]
i'm geniunely curious here, unless everybody else did the performance test while running 13 other things at the same time?
quote:I don't get it. It went up before the reboot, and after, it went down.
Resolution 320x240:
30 Objects: 37 iterations
60 Objects: 25 iterations
90 Objects: 18 iterations
120 Objects: 13 iterations
Resolution 640x480:
30 Objects: 39 iterations
60 Objects: 25 iterations
90 Objects: 18 iterations
120 Objects: 13 iterations
Resolution 960x720:
30 Objects: 41 iterations
60 Objects: 25 iterations
90 Objects: 17 iterations
120 Objects: 13 iterations
Test complete.
Windows ME, P3 700mhz, 256mb RAM
quote:
Drysart had this to say about Knight Rider:
Good question.Kill it after the test is done.
It was killed all right... 
Probally wouldn't have noticed it if it wasn't blocking access to the files when I went to delete them.
I think I suck.
AMD XP 1900, GeForce2 MX400, 512 ram.. Edit: Oh, and windows XP home. [ 10-16-2002: Message edited by: Delphi Aegis ]
Resolution 320x240:
30 Objects: 100 iterations
60 Objects: 52 iterations
90 Objects: 35 iterations
120 Objects: 27 iterations
Resolution 640x480:
30 Objects: 88 iterations
60 Objects: 49 iterations
90 Objects: 33 iterations
120 Objects: 25 iterations
Resolution 960x720:
30 Objects: 72 iterations
60 Objects: 43 iterations
90 Objects: 31 iterations
120 Objects: 24 iterations
Test complete.
Also did not leave a process running on my system. [ 10-16-2002: Message edited by: Falaanla Marr ]
1.9 GHz mobile P4, Windows XP SP1, 512 MB RAM
And the process goes away when you click the OK button. [ 10-16-2002: Message edited by: adenine! ]
Pentium 2 450 MHz, Voodoo3, Windows 98.
(This is to be expected, my system is several years outdated.)
quote:
Delphi Aegis obviously shouldn't have said:
I think I suck.AMD XP 1900, GeForce2 MX400, 512 ram..
dude...upgrade the video card.
that's like having a supercomputer with a monster 3d 2mb card. okay, not quite as bad.
but not to hijack the thread...continue. [ 10-16-2002: Message edited by: hard technology rock ]
So what you're telling us is that the game'll run smoothly; as long as we don't type or move the mouse? 
AMD Duron ~651MHz, Win2k, 256MB RAM
quote:
Verily, Rodent King doth proclaim:
So what you're telling us is that the game'll run smoothly; as long as we don't type or move the mouse?
no, he's trying to get a good idea of the power of our systems and how it runs uninterupted on different types.
you don't HAVE to keep everything completely still, but if the you don't, it's not an accurate portrayal of your computer's number crunching power, and so not only does it not help him, it may actually slow him down.
quote:
hard technology rock stopped beating up furries long enough to write:
dude...upgrade the video card.that's like having a supercomputer with a monster 3d 2mb card. okay, not quite as bad.
but not to hijack the thread...continue.
It *WAS* a voodoo3. As soon as anything better in the GeForce line comes out, assuming I have a job at that point, I'm buying it.
