512 RAM
852 mhz AMD Duron MMX
WinXP Pro

1.7ghz P4, 256MB RAM, WinXP Home

Athlon 1.3, GeForce4 4200, 784 megs of SD ram, XP Pro

[ 10-16-2002: Message edited by: Fennar ]

Athlon T-bird 1.33 GHz, GeForce 3, 512 Meg PC-2100 RAM, XP Home.

quote:

---

Drysart was naked while typing this:
Hmm.. some interesting patterns in the data. Will be interesting to see how far I can improve those numbers.

---

I can just see Drysart's sigpic saying that, cant you?

quote:

---

Drysart had this to say about Captain Planet:
Hmm.. some interesting patterns in the data. Will be interesting to see how far I can improve those numbers.

---

is it just my imagination, or does it seem to like athlons more?

(CPU) 1-AMD Thunderbird, 1000MHz
(RAM) 512MB (DDR PC2100)
(GFX) NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 100/200
(Display) 1280x1024/32bit/60Hz
(OS) Windows XP Professional (5.1 - 2600)

[ 10-17-2002: Message edited by: Kegwen 2.0 ]

quote:

---

hard technology rock had this to say about Knight Rider:
is it just my imagination, or does it seem to like athlons more?

---

OMG BLINDY IS SCREWED!

I suck at this "Humour" thing. Maybe I should try humor.

quote:

---

hard technology rock had this to say about Reading Rainbow:
is it just my imagination, or does it seem to like athlons more? are better number crunchers?

---

@ 700Mhz
Resolution 320x240:
30 Objects: 75 iterations
60 Objects: 39 iterations
90 Objects: 26 iterations
120 Objects: 20 iterations
Resolution 640x480:
30 Objects: 68 iterations
60 Objects: 36 iterations
90 Objects: 25 iterations
120 Objects: 19 iterations
Resolution 960x720:
30 Objects: 57 iterations
60 Objects: 33 iterations
90 Objects: 24 iterations
120 Objects: 18 iterations
Test complete.

quote:

---

Black Mage had this to say about Optimus Prime:
[QUOTE]hard technology rock had this to say about Reading Rainbow:
[qb]is it just my imagination, or does it seem to like athlons more? are better number crunchers?

---

Holy shit, look at that double quotage. I wont even touch that, it's a work of art.

Now I forget why I quoted you.

P4 2g, 512mb Ram, 64mb GeForce 2, Win XP Home

i'm confused. somebody make computers more consistant.

quote:

---

hard technology rock thought about the meaning of life:
is it just my imagination, or does it seem to like athlons more?

---

The code itself doesn't have any special support for anything other than MMX support, so it's not optimized for Intel or AMD in particular; but it's doing a LOT of memory access. P4s are probably getting hammered by the overhead of having protocol-based memory.

P4 1.5 ghz, 512 megs, Geforce 4 4400 128 mb, XP Home

P3 450, 512 ram, Geforce 200mx running standered drivers.

WinXP Pro, Pentium 4 2.0 GHz, 512 Ram, GeForce 4 4600

[ 10-17-2002: Message edited by: Azrael Heavenblade ]

Had programs running in the background last time. Athlon XP 1500+, 512 PC-2100, GeForce 2, Win XP Home

I have a 64Mb vidoe card, 312 ram, and 550ghz.

Resolution 320x240:
30 Objects: 36 iterations
60 Objects: 19 iterations
90 Objects: 13 iterations
120 Objects: 10 iterations
Resolution 640x480:
30 Objects: 34 iterations
60 Objects: 18 iterations
90 Objects: 12 iterations
120 Objects: 10 iterations
Resolution 960x720:
30 Objects: 31 iterations
60 Objects: 18 iterations
90 Objects: 12 iterations
120 Objects: 9 iterations
Test complete.

Pentium 4 1.8 GHz, GeForce 4 Ti 4200 (64 MB DDR RAM), 512 mb PC2100 DDR RAM

Win XP

[ 10-17-2002: Message edited by: Fazum'Zen Fastfist ]

Resolution 320x240:
30 Objects: 58 iterations
60 Objects: 31 iterations
90 Objects: 21 iterations
120 Objects: 16 iterations
Resolution 640x480:
30 Objects: 54 iterations
60 Objects: 30 iterations
90 Objects: 21 iterations
120 Objects: 16 iterations
Resolution 960x720:
30 Objects: 46 iterations
60 Objects: 27 iterations
90 Objects: 19 iterations
120 Objects: 15 iterations
Test complete.

Will do the desktop some other time

quote:

---

Drysart's unholy Backstreet Boys obsession manifested in:
The code itself doesn't have any special support for anything other than MMX support, so it's not optimized for Intel or AMD in particular; but it's doing a LOT of memory access. P4s are probably getting hammered by the overhead of having protocol-based memory.

---

Then why does mine seem to be the best of the bunch despite having a P4 and PC133 RAM?

Resolution 320x240:
30 Objects: 21 iterations
60 Objects: 12 iterations
90 Objects: 8 iterations
120 Objects: 6 iterations
Resolution 640x480:
30 Objects: 21 iterations
60 Objects: 12 iterations
90 Objects: 8 iterations
120 Objects: 6 iterations
Resolution 960x720:
30 Objects: 20 iterations
60 Objects: 11 iterations
90 Objects: 8 iterations
120 Objects: 6 iterations
Test complete.

That's all

1.4ghz athlon 512mb 2100 ddr, XP professional... radeon8500...

AMD Athlon 1800+XP at 1.56ghz, 512 DDR RAM, GeForce 4 Ti4200, running XP home.

1.4t-bird, 672megs ram, geforce 4200, one full day of playing DAoC without resetting.

p3 900mhz 384 megs geforce 3 winme

Resolution 320x240:
30 Objects: 25 iterations
60 Objects: 13 iterations
90 Objects: 9 iterations
120 Objects: 7 iterations
Resolution 640x480:
30 Objects: 24 iterations
60 Objects: 13 iterations
90 Objects: 9 iterations
120 Objects: 7 iterations
Resolution 960x720:
30 Objects: 22 iterations
60 Objects: 12 iterations
90 Objects: 9 iterations
120 Objects: 7 iterations
Test complete.

CPU: AMD Athlon 750Mhz
RAM: 512Mb
VID: GeForce 2-MX400/64Mb
WIN: Windows 98

AMD Duron 750, 256MB Ram, Win XP Pro

P4-2400
GF4-Ti 4200 64 mb
1 gig of DDR
XPSP1 Professional

AMD T-Bird 1.1 Gig
GeForce2 Ti
Windows 98 SE
512 PC-133

**sighs**
See why I keep grumbling about needing to upgrade my system?

AMD 700
392 RAM
Nvidia TNT2 32

Pentium 2 450 mhz 256megs of RAM, Voodoo4.

My main computer is brokn right now.