Fucking freaks.
quote:
"Abercrombie and Fitch is selling clothes to make children sexually stimulating to adults," said Brian Camenker of theParents' Rights CoalitionParents Who Are Convinced that Everyone Else in the World is a Pedophile and Wants Their Children's Bodies.
If lots of people buy them, then a lot of people wanted them, and they'll stay on the market.
Hooray for capitolism.
It's up to the consumer to decide what to buy unless the vendor is selling illegal merchandise.
Devil'sAdvocate2win
I'm not in any way saying they should sell this, though. I think it's pretty pointless.
Yes, that's right, hot live sex!But look at the polls. About 77% agree with it..
Freaks.
THEY'RE GONNA WEAR THE THONG, WHETHER OR NOT IT'S MARKETED TO THEM. 
quote:
Kegwen 2.0 had this to say about Captain Planet:
There are way too many whorish 12 year olds with credit cards for that to work, Maradon.
No, ya see, it's because of them that it will work.
If there's that many kids out there that want to express themselves like that, then it's thier constitutional right to do so.
I don't give a rat's ass if you're 8 or 80, I really don't see how younger kids are exempt from the first amendment.
quote:
The logic train ran off the tracks when Azakias said:
But look at the polls. About 77% agree with it..Freaks.
No, about 77% disagree with it.
quote:
Maradön? had this to say about Matthew Broderick:
If there's that many kids out there that want to express themselves like that, then it's thier constitutional right to do so.
The Constitution doesnt really apply to children. Thanks.
Like..um...a thong isn't going to make your teacher rape your 10 year old daughter, you know. I've seen plenty of thongs at school, most of them MANY TIMES WORSE THAN THE ONE SHOWN IN THE PICTURE AT THAT SITE (think those ones with the little straps that seem to crawl halfway up their body). It's nothing really...new.
marketing clothing that makes their children more attractive to adults? Only if little Suzie is going around flashing her undies at Hans the child molester. I mean, jesus, they're UNDERPANTS. It's not like they're wearing them on their head.
quote:
ACES! Another post by Maradön?:
No, about 77% disagree with it.
I know, I know.. my sleep fogged mind read that wrong. 
quote:
So quoth Pesco:
The Constitution doesnt really apply to children. Thanks.
Why not?
quote:
Arttemis the Twink was listening to Cher while typing:
Who cares? Nobody's going to see it anyway...marketing clothing that makes their children more attractive to adults? Only if little Suzie is going around flashing her undies at Hans the child molester. I mean, jesus, they're UNDERPANTS. It's not like they're wearing them on their head.
Are you trying to tell me you never wore your underpants on your head as a kid?
quote:
Pesco got all f'ed up on Angel Dust and wrote:
The Constitution doesnt really apply to children. Thanks.
quote:
When the babel fish was in place, it was apparent Maradön? said:
I don't give a rat's ass if you're 8 or 80, I really don't see how younger kids are exempt from the first amendment.
Here, we think that all children are always being watched by millions of pedophiles that would sweep in and rape them if given the chance!
RIGHT?
NO.
However, parents are convinced of that. It's pathetic. I can understand slight concern, but some of the measures taken are ridiculous.
One day my 6 year old (male) cousin was just running around, and my 18 year old (female) cousin grabbed him and attempted to entertain him as one would normally entertain someone his age. Without reason, he said (rather loudly, in fact) "Stop touching my penis!" He was conditioned to say that. Kinda scary, and sadly it's almost necessary. 
quote:
JooJooFlop had this to say about Optimus Prime:
Why not?
Yeah, I'd like to hear why exactly I have no constitutional rights too.
quote:
JooJooFlop thought this was the Ricky Martin Fan Club Forum and wrote:
Why not?
Because they "technically" cant understand them.
quote:
Pesco had this to say about the Spice Girls:
Because they "technically" cant understand them.
Neither can the mentally disabled.
So you're saying because they don't defend thier rights, they have no right to them? That adds up real nice. [ 05-22-2002: Message edited by: Maradön? ]
quote:
Pesco had this to say about Jimmy Carter:
The Constitution doesnt really apply to children. Thanks.
That's fucking pathetic.
The problem is that "children" is legally defined as >18. Comeon.
quote:
Suddar Williams had this to say about Optimus Prime:
I'd voice my opinion on the matter but I'm a minor and thus I lack constitutional rights.Yes, sir, I like the beating. Please give me more.
Edit: add [ 05-22-2002: Message edited by: Kegwen 2.0 ]
quote:
Maradön? stopped beating up furries long enough to write:
Neither can the mentally disabled.
Different subject entirely.
) can't understand the constitution, either, but you can be sure that he's out there demonstrating.quote:
Pesco had this to say about Captain Planet:
Because they "technically" cant understand them.
So you can violate someone's constitutional rights so long as they don't know they have them?
quote:
Kegwen 2.0 said this about your mom:
That's fucking pathetic.The problem is that "children" is legally defined as >18. Comeon.
Actually... it most states.. A child is considered >16/17
quote:
JooJooFlop stumbled drunkenly to the keyboard and typed:
So you can violate someone's constitutional rights so long as they don't know they have them?
It makes PERFECT sense.
Yes sir, I like the abuse. Please, give me more.
quote:
Pesco had this to say about Captain Planet:
Actually... it most states.. A child is considered >16/17
Yeah, so I STILL have no constitutional rights. And I think I can "technically" understand it.
quote:
Suddar Williams painfully thought these words up:
Yes sir, I like the abuse. Please, give me more.
That sounds more like consentual BSDM, something very different.
Dont argue with me over a known fact. Children cannot exercise Constitutional Rights on there own. It must be with some sort of Parental/Gaurdian Assistance. This falls under the same category as why children that commit the same crimes as adults get different punishments.
quote:
This insanity brought to you by JooJooFlop:
That sounds more like consentual BSDM, something very different.
hte funnay si not wit hyuo...
I hope you know he was referring to the fact that having no Constitutional rights as a child is essentially slavery...
