quote:
Drysart enlisted the help of an infinite number of monkeys to write:
http://www.evercrest.com/archivesand
http://www.evercrest.com/forums
both work now.
Archives work for me. Forums still don't (Connection refused when trying to connect to www2.evercrest.com:8080). [ 02-27-2004: Message edited by: Rabidbunnylover'nix ]
that's mean. 
quote:
Kegwen stopped beating up furries long enough to write:
your oversized sig code hates Firefox so much that it lies to anyone that uses it about their sig sizethat's mean.
Maybe you should use IE then!
quote:
Kegwen scribbled:
your oversized sig code hates Firefox so much that it lies to anyone that uses it about their sig sizethat's mean.
.isig {
background-image: url(http://static.evercrest.com/forums/ubb/ecimg/sigtoobig2.gif);
background-position-x: left;
background-position-y: 100px;
background-repeat: repeat-x;
}
Tell the fucking Firefox developers to support the standards correctly.
quote:
Gadani's unholy Backstreet Boys obsession manifested in:
I wonder if my sig is too big...
My sig is now (partially?) reporting that it's too big.. but the images are all 100 pixels high, and I think the text is fine..
I'm confused?
quote:
Rabidbunnylover'nix's fortune cookie read:
Archives work for me. Forums still don't (Connection refused when trying to connect to www2.evercrest.com:8080).
/Forums now works for me
--Satan, quoted by John Milton
quote:
Abbikat had this to say:
My sig is now (partially?) reporting that it's too big.. but the images are all 100 pixels high, and I think the text is fine..
When you use two pictures on opposite sides, it pushes one of them further down than the other. Don't ask me why.
quote:
Kegwen had this to say about Optimus Prime:
your oversized sig code hates Firefox so much that it lies to anyone that uses it about their sig sizethat's mean.
Meh, I fixed it. 
Adblock extension.
quote:
What the Mortious??
When you use two pictures on opposite sides, it pushes one of them further down than the other. Don't ask me why.
Only if you've got anything between the [img=left] and [img=right] tags ... even if it's only a space. That's also the reason why sometimes phantom extra space shows up below an image when that's all you've got ... you've got something after the [img] tag, and the way images line up with text in HTML, it'll add a few extra pixels below the image.
quote:
Bloodsage had this to say about the Spice Girls:
I like the birthday thing. . .but why not use only the day/month in deference both to us old people and the youngsters who don't want to be treated like kiddies?
Amen to that. Nobody needs to know how old I am. I'm in denial myself. 
quote:
We were all impressed when Doomie wrote:
Meh, I fixed it.Adblock extension.
I TOTALLY FORGOT ABOUT THAT. (I even had it installed)
Hah!
quote:
Drysart was listening to Cher while typing:
.isig {
background-image: url(http://static.evercrest.com/forums/ubb/ecimg/sigtoobig2.gif);
background-position-x: left;
background-position-y: 100px;
background-repeat: repeat-x;
}Tell the fucking Firefox developers to support the standards correctly.
Maybe I will. [ 02-28-2004: Message edited by: Kegwen ]
Until then, Adblock pwns the annoying image.
quote:
Rabidbunnylover'nix's unholy Backstreet Boys obsession manifested in:
Testing a too big signature to see what Firefox does.
Well I disabled his image anyway, but for me it was showing every sig as too big, regardless of size.
quote:
Drysart Model 2000 was programmed to say:
.isig {
background-image: url(http://static.evercrest.com/forums/ubb/ecimg/sigtoobig2.gif);
background-position-x: left;
background-position-y: 100px;
background-repeat: repeat-x;
}Tell the fucking Firefox developers to support the standards correctly.
Are you sure background-position-x and background-position-y are 'standard'? [ 02-29-2004: Message edited by: Iulius Czar ]
quote:
Iulius Czar scribbled:
<A HREF="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fforums.evercrest.com%2Fcgi-bin%2Fultimatebb.cgi%3Fubb%3Dget_topic%26f%3D1%26t%3D053790%26p%3D2%26notesok%3D1&war n ing=1&profile=css3&usermedium=all" TARGET=_blank>W3C CSS Thingy</A>Are you sure background-position-x and background-position-y are 'standard'?
Sons of bitches. It should be, as background-position is, and pretty much every other composite CSS attribute has single attributes for each subproperty.
quote:
What the Somthor??
so when are people gonna fix their sigs so you dont have to look at that red line?
Starting tonight any time I see the red line, I'm going to strip the sig.
quote:
Talonus scribbled:
Bug I don't remember seeing before. If you enter a word with 3 letters or less into search, it displays a blank result. Even if you enter a 3 letter world and a 4 letter word, it'll come up blank.
Here, I'll copy and paste right off the search screen:
quote:
You may only search for keywords that are 4 characters long, or longer.
There are also a lot of blanked out names in the last responce name area, and I know I don't have anyone ignored, and haven't heard of any recent bans/blacklists.
There is one in Abbi's thread, two of the ET threads, and a couple others.
The front page itself doesn't seem to be refreshing when someone posts, regularly.
quote:
Faelynn LeAndris had this to say about Matthew Broderick:
There are also a lot of blanked out names in the last responce name area, and I know I don't have anyone ignored, and haven't heard of any recent bans/blacklists.There is one in Abbi's thread, two of the ET threads, and a couple others.
That's because those threads are unbumpable.
