138F won't kill processors though. How many threads do we need about this?
And how does it seem high, anyway? It seems to me that people base processor temperatures as if there were people's temperatures. None of these people seem to actually know anything about circuits... Waisz fucked around with this message on 02-02-2005 at 11:13 PM.
My old thunderbird core used to run at damn near 200f Maradon! fucked around with this message on 02-02-2005 at 11:55 PM.
I'd give you a fourth temp, but the thermocouple broke in the most in opertune place, and I can't fix it atm...
Unfourtunitly, i cant get the processor off the motherboard since a while ago i hit over 200F and seem to have fried it to the board.
quote:
The logic train ran off the tracks when Y.O.T.C said:
94FUnfourtunitly, i cant get the processor off the motherboard since a while ago i hit over 200F and seem to have fried it to the board.
Haha, no.
If any part of the processor melted, it wouldn't work any more.
quote:
Waisz said this about your mom:
Haha, no.If any part of the processor melted, it wouldn't work any more.
If anything, the thermal paste could've basically went cement on him. Heh.
I was surprised to find out that pretty much anything under a 3ghz speed from both companies can run up to about 90 Celsius before suffering adverse effects.
It's not something people hear about.
quote:
Sean said this about your mom:
Check Intel and AMD's sites for safe operating temperatures per processor.I was surprised to find out that pretty much anything under a 3ghz speed from both companies can run up to about 90 Celsius before suffering adverse effects.
Except that the thermal celing on the P4 processor series is listed as 76C for the lower end (2.0 range) stepping down to 72C at the upper end (3.06 on the 478 socket). Running it over that voids warranty, etc, etc.
