Unfortunately I don't have a clue apart from that. Does anyone have a suggestion that could help the stupid Dane out? 
Anyway, does someone who actually knows have any idea? [Edit: Alright, thanks Suddar] [ 09-21-2003: Message edited by: Jens ]
quote:
Holden had this to say about Punky Brewster:
We have a Canon Powershot A60 We got from Amazon.com with FREE Shipping!
Is it a good camera, or is it so bad they have to give free shipping to get rid of it?
quote:
Jens enlisted the help of an infinite number of monkeys to write:
Uh...ha?Anyway, does someone who actually knows have any idea? [Edit: Alright, thanks Suddar]
I've used the Fuji Finepix FP3800. It owns. It's about $300 last I checked. Very, very nice camera. 3.24MP etc~
quote:
Check out the big brain on Azizza!
Gateway Has a new line of Digital cameras. I haven't seen a real review on them yet but the 4MP version is only around 200 bucks!
For that little money, they will either be seriously flawed or very bare-boned.
Megapixels aren't the only thing to consider when factoring price, or quality. How well the sensor handles colors and overexposure, how well the camera focuses, and the range of features. That camera may very well be entirely manual, or it may not be able to focus correctly outside of a certain range, etc... those are just as important, if not moreso, as megapixels, for obvious reasons.
Then again, I'm thinking in terms of a year ago, so it may not be so bad in today's pricing. [ 09-21-2003: Message edited by: Suddar ]
quote:
Everyone wondered WTF when Absolut Blindy wrote:
if you are looking to take "personal pictures", i would say a 27x zoom lens is advisible, given your condition.
That was incredibly stupid.
And Jens: The Fuji Finepix series is pretty good. I have a 1.3 Megapixel one, without any sort of zoom on it that works perfectly for around the house stuff (Though I may get a new one soon to take pictures when my brother is at his ball games and such so I can send em home, but thats another story)
But yeah...I'd say Fuji Finepix series 
quote:
Suddar impressed everyone with:
For that little money, they will either be seriously flawed or very bare-boned.Megapixels aren't the only thing to consider when factoring price, or quality. How well the sensor handles colors and overexposure, how well the camera focuses, and the range of features. That camera may very well be entirely manual, or it may not be able to focus correctly outside of a certain range, etc... those are just as important, if not moreso, as megapixels, for obvious reasons.
Then again, I'm thinking in terms of a year ago, so it may not be so bad in today's pricing.
I heard they were made by Olympus. 
I do not recommended the Fuji Finepix A303... the pictures blur far far too easily.
edit: It has a 3-4 second exposure time. If you manage to keep a steady hand in those 4 seconds, and if your subject doesn't move, then your picture comes out fine. Otherwise, forget it. [ 09-21-2003: Message edited by: Kegwen ]
quote:
Naimah had this to say about pies:
Nikon anyone?
Fuji > Nikon > Olympus > all
Personally I use a Nikon N80 as my Film Camera and a Minolta Dimage 7hi as my Digital.
[ 09-21-2003: Message edited by: nem-x ]
quote:
Azizza stopped beating up furries long enough to write:
Nikon are top of the line inFilm andHigh level digital cameras.
I never thought i'd find myself half agreeing with Azizza. [ 09-21-2003: Message edited by: leckzilla! ]
quote:
This one time, at Kegwen camp:
Fuji > Nikon > Olympus > all
Canon's got some good low-mid level digital cameras, which I think compete just fine with Fuji's offerings, if not surpass. Nikon's suck for low end for the most part, but yes, in high end digital (from what I've seen) they rock the casbah.
quote:
Suddar had this to say about Matthew Broderick:
Canon's got some good low-mid level digital cameras, which I think compete just fine with Fuji's offerings, if not surpass. Nikon's suck for low end for the most part, but yes, in high end digital (from what I've seen) they rock the casbah.
Yes Nikon's professional stuff rocks hard. Have pictures, will prove.
[/URL][ 09-22-2003: Message edited by: Azizza ]
quote:
From the book of Azizza, chapter 3, verse 16:
Not to hijack this thread, but which Nikon did you say you use Leck? I could swear you mentioned it in another thread but I can't find it.
When my college lecturer was nice enough to let me use it I used our studio's D-100. I'm not an expert on digital cameras because I've not had the desire to go digital yet. Silver based photography is still as good as a high end digital, just requires a little more work.
quote:
Naimah had this to say about dark elf butts:
I use the Nikon CP5700 and it never disapoints. It certainly isn't the D line but it is still quite good.
That is the lowest level Nikon I would get. In fact I almost did. The only reason I got the minolta was that it didn't have a button activated zoom. I still prefer the SLR stule ring, which the Dimage has.
And Leck, the D-100 is a fine fine camera. I wish I could have afforded one. But my budget was 1300 and that was set in stone.
Perhaps that's why they suck. 
quote:
Suddar had this to say about Optimus Prime:
I never edit my digital camera's pictures.Perhaps that's why they suck.
I'm not gonna tell you again... 
quote:
Jens thought this was the Ricky Martin Fan Club Forum and wrote:
I'm looking for good quality pictures. Resolution isn't of terrible importance, doesn't have to go super high. The size of the camera doesn't really matter, I won't be using it much outside the house. Ideally, I'm looking to pay $300 at the most.Unfortunately I don't have a clue apart from that. Does anyone have a suggestion that could help the stupid Dane out?
If you are looking for cameras for a low price go to this site http://sites.onlinesupplier.com/folder19617/ 
Great Products
[ 03-10-2004: Message edited by: Niklas ]
If you're going to solicit on the message board, can we post on your website?
I forget which version it is
If you like the quality of the pics I post here, I advise getting one of these.
It takes good pictures IMO.
And, is easily under 300$.
EDIT: Awww. it is a rez.. here I was hoping Leck had come back for a bit. [ 03-10-2004: Message edited by: Trent ]
I don't think Jens is still shoppin, folks!
quote:
Trent wrote this then went back to looking for porn:
.EDIT: Awww. it is a rez.. here I was hoping Leck had come back for a bit.
me 2 dude lol
quote:
How.... Vorbis.... uughhhhhh:
me 2 dude lol
That's what my edit was all about
