EverCrest Message Forums
You are not logged in. Login or Register.
Author
Topic: Half Life 2 and Nvidia
Mr. Duck
Likes to ____!
posted 09-10-2003 09:50:52 PM
Valso the WhiteDragon
Pancake
posted 09-10-2003 10:21:04 PM
Very interesting

I will be exceited to see actually benchmarks, or are there some already?

And very glad I took my gf5600 back

Kegwen
Sonyfag
posted 09-10-2003 10:23:06 PM
That is so not cool
Nwist, Who?
Nwist
posted 09-10-2003 10:23:57 PM
So what's this mean for use computer illiterate people?
Kegwen
Sonyfag
posted 09-10-2003 10:25:07 PM
quote:
ACES! Another post by Warlord Darius:
So what's this mean for use computer illiterate people?

nvidia cards are going to get crappy performance in Half-Life 2 compared to similarly priced ATi cards, and Valve insists that they didn't do it on purpose.

Azizza
VANDERSHANKED
posted 09-10-2003 10:27:58 PM
quote:
From the book of Kegwen, chapter 3, verse 16:
and Valve insists that they didn't do it on purpose.

Yeah and how many actually believe that?

"Pacifism is a privilege of the protected"
Kegwen
Sonyfag
posted 09-10-2003 10:29:05 PM
Damnit, now I need to upgrade.

[ 09-10-2003: Message edited by: Kegwen ]

Nwist, Who?
Nwist
posted 09-10-2003 10:30:00 PM
quote:
Kegwen had this to say about Tron:
nvidia cards are going to get crappy performance in Half-Life 2 compared to similarly priced ATi cards, and Valve insists that they didn't do it on purpose.

I have an NVidia GeForce 3 > : (

Canadian Mountee
Rumble Pak+FMV Sequence=FUN!
posted 09-10-2003 10:31:48 PM
quote:
Azizza had this to say about Pirotess:
Yeah and how many actually believe that?

They must be teamed up with ATI!!!!!!!!

It's a conspiracy.

The World is Yours
Kegwen
Sonyfag
posted 09-10-2003 10:33:28 PM
quote:
Warlord Darius's account was hax0red to write:
I have an NVidia GeForce 3 > : (

I have a GeForce4 Ti4200, which isn't enough either.

Nwist, Who?
Nwist
posted 09-10-2003 10:34:34 PM
quote:
Kegwen had this to say about Knight Rider:
I have a GeForce4 Ti4200, which isn't enough either.

So... are we talking about having all the graphics and clip planes jacked to hell and running smoothing, or minimum requirements here?

Iulius Czar
Pancake
posted 09-10-2003 10:36:55 PM
Mmm, sweet vindication for sucking in EverQuest.
Kegwen
Sonyfag
posted 09-10-2003 10:39:07 PM
quote:
This insanity brought to you by Iulius Czar:
Mmm, sweet vindication for sucking in EverQuest.

No, it's just unfair. You can't release a game that's obviously biased towards one of two major competitors when it's going to be this popular. That's not cool at all.

Falaanla Marr
I AM HOT CHIX
posted 09-10-2003 11:01:27 PM
quote:
Kegwen had this to say about Robocop:
No, it's just unfair. You can't release a game that's obviously biased towards one of two major competitors when it's going to be this popular. That's not cool at all.

Yes you can.

It's called "making money". Most of the Nvidia users either wont know this, or wont care -- its Half Life 2! The few that do care will switch vid card companies, meaning more money for valve if there is a partnership.

If ATI did indeed partner with Valve, its smart of them to do this (make the game best on Radeon cards). This game is so popular, people WILL get radeons for it, at least alot will.

A fun fact too -- At E3, Valve was near the ATI booth, if i remember right, and HL2 was being shown on a Radeon

FYI. I use a GeForce card, and likely always will. So I'm not saying this because im an ATI fanboy or anything.

[ 09-10-2003: Message edited by: Falaanla Marr ]

Kegwen
Sonyfag
posted 09-10-2003 11:04:57 PM
quote:
Falaanla Marr enlisted the help of an infinite number of monkeys to write:
Yes you can.

It's called "making money".

If ATI did indeed partner with Valve, its smart of them to do this (make the game best on Radeon cards). This game is so popular, people WILL get radeons for it, at least alot will.


No, that's LOSING MONEY for Valve on loyal nVidia customers, and nVidia also loses money because everyone wants their uber system to run HL2 well, and as such they will go ATi.

ATi makes money here, not Valve. I don't see what they have to gain from it unless they are indeed partnered.

It may be a driver issue with nVidia though, and if they're actually willing to work with nVidia on the issue, they may be able to resolve it before release, and then all this mess can go away.

Falaanla Marr
I AM HOT CHIX
posted 09-10-2003 11:07:33 PM
quote:
Kegwen had this to say about (_|_):
No, that's LOSING MONEY for Valve on loyal nVidia customers, and nVidia also loses money because everyone wants their uber system to run HL2 well, and as such they will go ATi.

ATi makes money here, not Valve. I don't see what they have to gain from it unless they are indeed partnered.

It may be a driver issue with nVidia though, and if they're actually willing to work with nVidia on the issue, they may be able to resolve it before release, and then all this mess can go away.



Exactly, they likely are partnered if this is intentional. I mean, ATi would WANT to push NVidia out of business

Its a win win situation for valve. Sure, they lose a few sales from people that actually check out benchmarks and wont sway from a nvidia card, but they keep most of em, and ATi gets some more card sales.

Snugglits
I LIKE TO ABUSE THE ALERT MOD BUTTON AND I ENJOY THE FLAVOR OF SWEET SWEET COCK.
posted 09-10-2003 11:15:33 PM
Oh well, I wasn't that impressed by HL2, anyway.

Counterstrike is a cesspool. Valve seems to be the breeding ground for stupidity.

[b].sig removed by Mr. Parcelan[/b]
Kegwen
Sonyfag
posted 09-10-2003 11:16:39 PM
I'll take Business Ethics for 500, Alex.
Mortious
Gluttonous Overlard
posted 09-10-2003 11:18:00 PM
Half-Life 2 has had problems with nVidia FX architecture for a while now.

Face it, the "special code" they had to write for FX cards is because they fucked up the original game code in the first place and are covering their asses.

Tatsukaze
wants Kloie's mom OH SO BAD
posted 09-10-2003 11:24:49 PM
I my Radeon 9800 Pro.
Kegwen
Sonyfag
posted 09-10-2003 11:25:28 PM
quote:
ACES! Another post by Tatsukaze:
I my Radeon 9800 Pro.

I bet you all that time you're gonna have to play HL2, too.


[ 09-10-2003: Message edited by: Kegwen ]

TheOriginalZane
Pancake
posted 09-10-2003 11:35:35 PM
quote:
Warlord Darius probably says this to all the girls:
So... are we talking about having all the graphics and clip planes jacked to hell and running smoothing, or minimum requirements here?

You can't run best performance, that's about it. The new Nvidia card can run it but because of the fuck up with the coding it doesn't run it as well as the ATI. I think the only ones that are going to care are the hardcore gamers that are running Nvidia's card. It's due to the drivers. I'm pretty sure they had a large article about it on Gamespy about how horrible the drivers are for Nvidia's 5900. My uncle has a beta of Half-Life2 and ran it on a Geforece FX and had little to no problems, unless he ran the game at best performance.
yes, you'll need to upgrade from your Geforce 3 no matter what.
Buy a 9800 pro, it's cheaper and better.

[ 09-10-2003: Message edited by: ToastedFritters ]

The worst member of EC.
Live Journal
Mr. Duck
Likes to ____!
posted 09-10-2003 11:52:44 PM
Mightion Defensor
posted 09-11-2003 12:25:18 AM
quote:
Mr. Duck wrote this then went back to looking for porn:
The Benchmarks

So, my TI4400 might actually run HL2 playably? How strange.

Y.O.T.C
No longer a Towel Girl
posted 09-13-2003 05:24:20 PM
Slightly old, but what do you think the chances of my ati rage pro working with the game since it hates nvidia so much?
Kegwen
Sonyfag
posted 09-13-2003 05:40:20 PM
quote:
Hello Cuthy had this to say about (_|_):
Slightly old, but what do you think the chances of my ati rage pro working with the game since it hates nvidia so much?

0% chance

Peter
Pancake
posted 09-13-2003 05:42:27 PM
You know, Even If HL2 is skew towards ATi, Isn't Doom3 written in favor to nVidia? Seems it would be an even matchup then.
Kegwen
Sonyfag
posted 09-13-2003 05:43:08 PM
quote:
And I was all like 'Oh yeah?' and Peter was all like:
You know, Even If HL2 is skew towards ATi, Isn't Doom3 written in favor to nVidia? Seems it would be an even matchup then.

Nobody cares about Doom3

Nwist, Who?
Nwist
posted 09-13-2003 05:49:10 PM
quote:
This one time, at Kegwen camp:
Nobody cares about Doom3

I do

Kegwen
Sonyfag
posted 09-13-2003 05:51:16 PM
quote:
Warlord Darius had this to say about Cuba:
I do

ho noes

Kegwen
Sonyfag
posted 09-13-2003 05:53:14 PM
quote:
Mr. Duck had this to say about Cuba:
The Benchmarks

btw, in case any of you think these are applicable, they aren't. Reason?

quote:
DX9, PS 2.0, Full precision floating-point
2.8 GHz P-IV, 800 MHz FSB
Average of several test DEM files
Check Dealtime for prices
NVIDIA Detonator 45.23
ATI Catalyst 3.7

Detonator 50s will show us how it's REALLY gonna be. This is just in case you didn't bother to read the other threads where this was already said.

[ 09-13-2003: Message edited by: Kegwen ]

Nwist, Who?
Nwist
posted 09-13-2003 05:56:29 PM
Slightly off topic question: Let's say I were to buy an Radeon 9800 mostly for Half-Life 2. At some point down the road a game doesn't play so well with it; can I pop my Nvidia back in freely, or will my computer bitchslap me for changing video cards back and forth?
Burger
BANNED!
posted 09-13-2003 06:54:41 PM
In the beginning, when microsoft was preparing the DX9 spec, the asked everybody to let them see all pertinent patents to certain things. Both intel and Nvidia said "fuck off" because they had patents that they were hording for their own good, and weren't about to share with microsoft. Microsoft got angry, and because of this, did not pander to either company when writing the specs for DX9.

Consewuently, the 24bit precision that ATI has used for a while became the minimum precision for DX9 and the GCC code in DX9 is more suited to a typical ATi architecture. (the special shader commands are more easily compiled for ATi hardware).

Nvidia got pissed. Their FX series of cards cannot do 24 bit precision. They do 16bit faster than ati, and 32bit slower. so, in order to maintain at least the level of precision in new games, the FX is forced to run at it's slower, higher precision mode. Also, the FX engine has a LOT of extra GCC commands that are nvidia specific, can replace the functionality of DX9 standard GCC commands and run much more quickly on the FX engine. Another disadvantage is that DX9 calls for 8 pixel shader pipelines, ATi implemented 8 individual pipelines each capable of one operation per clock, and nvidia implemented 4 each capable of 2. The downside is that in the nvidia hardware, both operations must be completed on the same pixel. If you have a pixel that needs three operations, then you waste a half clock on the nvidia hardware.

Valve coded HL2 strictly according to the DirexctX 9 specifications. That means 24bit colour, using standard GCC operations in shaders (instead of ATi or Nvidia specific ones) and just generally following the spec to the letter. If they couldn't do something without using a hardware specific method, they found another way.

This is very good for ATi, because when they were designing R3xx, they had DX9 in mind, and optimized the core to the spec. A core matched to spec and code matched to spec work well together.

This is very bad for Nvidia, because even though it can run DX9 code, it's not a true directx9 part. It can't do 8 pixels per pass, or 24 bit colour, and it's slow at standard operations. It's fast at 16 bit precision and whups on the ATi, and if you use the nvidia specific code, then you get improved performance, but as it stands, it's not a DX9 part.

Valve ran the original codepath (pure DX9) on both cards, and were shocked all to hell that it ran like as on the GFX (well, maybe not) but it prompted them to write all new shaders exploiting the faster nvidia specific commands. This gave a considerable advantage, but still not up to the same performance as a comparably priced ATi part.

Should Valve have to write a different shader for each architecture on the market? I wouldn't think so. I'd think that it's the responsibility of the cardmaker to ensure that it performs well with industry standards.

I'm pissed at ATi as well, because they have all but forsaken openGL performance on the new core, and get spanked to hell and back by the Nvidia card that excels at opengl.

I'm expecting that the new DET 50's will either have even more optimized shaders to replace the valve ones (increasing performance without touching visual quality). They may decide to run the whole thing in 16 bit precision, and if that's the case, expect a large increase in speed, but with a big hit to visual quality as well. Other than that, I don't know what to expect.

(and a big part of why nvidia's current part is getting beat by ati's is that it just doesn't have the same raw shader performance. In a dx8 environment, it performs much better, but the shader engine on the 5x00 series of cards is a little subpar. Let's hope that next generation is better)

Bite me.

No, Really. Bite me.

Burger
BANNED!
posted 09-13-2003 07:00:07 PM
quote:
We were all impressed when Warlord Darius wrote:
Slightly off topic question: Let's say I were to buy an Radeon 9800 mostly for Half-Life 2. At some point down the road a game doesn't play so well with it; can I pop my Nvidia back in freely, or will my computer bitchslap me for changing video cards back and forth?

when you uninstall video drivers, there are normally remnants left over in the registry and such that will hamper performance. EX: A 5900 performs better after a clan install than after being put into a machine that just had a clean install with an ati card in there. (normally best to format->reinstall when switching cards) otherwise, use a reg cleaner between.

Bite me.

No, Really. Bite me.

Delphi Aegis
Delphi. That's right. The oracle. Ask me anything. Anything about your underwear.
posted 09-13-2003 07:40:24 PM
This sums up my thoughts and feelings regarding Valve right about now (Non looping gif):

Sentow, Maybe
Pancake
posted 09-13-2003 09:23:11 PM
quote:
Kegwen had this to say about (_|_):
I'll take Business Ethics for 500, Alex.

"The answer is: Something not found in business."
"...what are ethics?"
"CORRECT!"

/bonk

Once more into the breach, my friends, once more. We'll close the wall with our dead. In peace, nothing so becomes a man as modesty and humility, but when the blast of war blows in our ears, then imitate the action of the tiger, summon up the blood, disguise fair nature with rage and lend the eye a terrible aspect.
Toktuk
Pooh Ogre
Keeper of the Shoulders of Peachis Perching
posted 09-13-2003 10:14:04 PM
*Shrug* I'm not really interested in purchasing another Valve game. They beat Half Life and Counterstrike into the ground. I dislike the way they repackaged and re-sold Half Life + Mods so many times and sold it for almost as much as a brand new game each time. What happened to TF2? I guess that was one of those "Oops! We were just kidding about that" kind of things.

As far as shooters go, I'm looking forward to Battlefield Vietnam, Call of Duty, and DOOM 3.

-Tok

[ 09-13-2003: Message edited by: Toktuk ]

Naimah
In a Fire
posted 09-13-2003 11:18:19 PM
TF2 is based on the HL2 engine. They are going to release it shortly after HL2 from what I understand.
Toktuk
Pooh Ogre
Keeper of the Shoulders of Peachis Perching
posted 09-14-2003 02:25:59 PM
quote:
Naimah had this to say about dark elf butts:
TF2 is based on the HL2 engine. They are going to release it shortly after HL2 from what I understand.

Have mad linkage from a reputable source as proof?

-Tok

All times are US/Eastern
Hop To: