One question I don't know the answer to, though.
Warrior or SK?
quote:
Ruvyen Warblade had this to say about John Romero:Warrior or SK?
Before I state my opinion and we go on and on about things regarding it ^_^ let me ask,
What is the purpose for this character?
Roleplay?
Fun?
To be the best?
To stalk someone?
Ferrel!
I've always liked warriors, but I dunno...
"Don't want to sound like a fanboy, but I am with you. I'll buy it for sure, it's just a matter of for how long I will be playing it..."
- Silvast, Battle.net forums
Warriors dont have to be evil, Sks pretty much do, for the most part.
Warriors level a tiny bit faster then SKs (Yes, they do. Warriors and rogues retained their exp bonus even after hybrids had their penalties removed), so fun wise, you'll get more levels quicker.
SKs have a huge variety of spells, one of the best out there and you dont have to wait forever for them.
Warriors get combat skills sooner and tend not to die as much early on.
Ferrel!
SKs get an invisibilty spell.
Warriors don't.
SKs get FD.
Warriors don't.
(Not counting items of course.)
You want RP? Shadow Knights live to serve Cazic-thule and carry his will to the far corners of Norrath and Luclin. We are the bringers of death. We rarely eat. We never sleep. And we will never stop. (I love 'The Mummy')
We work towards Greenmist(something warriors don't get) 1h slash, 18/24(I think), str, mr, agi, other stats. second best 1h slash in the game. PLus we can get Innorruuk's Curse.
Plus most people want you for groups. With your spells and melee abilities, you can get good groups and keep aggro on you. Making it simple to keep track of healing. Trust me, become an Iksar Shadow Knight. You'll love it.
Did I mention spells? All our spells are useful for us. Debuffs of all kind, strength, ATK, Skill points, AC drains. Lifetaps. Pets(which sucks MAJOR ass). Plus our harmtouch. 10xlevel+1 damage. Works like a charm in some situations. Saved many a group member and my life on PVP raids.
Or you can be a warrior. Kick. Hit. Get hurt. Get healed. Kick. Hit. Get hurt. etc. etc. etc. BORING
Your choice though.
Yeah.
quote:
Seurenna had this to say about Matthew Broderick:
You should be the Warrior...because...uhm...warriors...get a better mez...that...SK's don't get, because they don't have enough mana...with thier weapons...and thier epic is better.Yeah.
A for effort!
Iksars make semi-ok Necromancers, IF you twink the hell outta them to get over the lower starting Int. The native regen later becomes nice, if you can get a Zlandicar Heart. Warriors are warriors. Typically if you've played one, you've played them all. SK's are some of the most frustrating things in EQ, ESPECIALLY Iksar SK's. Slowest leveling thing in the game, even after the Hybrid XP boost (racial XP hit).
Monks are just good asskickers and having the regen and AC boost over a human is damn nice. And the AC and Regen boost for a shaman, especially when you start looking into a regen tunic, chloroplast and native regen, are really killer.
