Well read the short (2 page) article above.

Ladies, do you think hes right at all or talking out of his ass?

Men, same question

Just one more pathetic attempt to rationalize the traditional male stupidity of, "Hey, any girl who doesn't want me has to be defective." I especially like the idea that women aren't really people, but rather more like puppies, who don't know what's good for them--and thus need a big, strong man to take care of them.

Please.

I think it was a lot of sterotyping, and like Bloodsage said, rationalizing why they were dumped by saying there must be something wrong with the woman.

Sure, there's golddigging bimbos out there; talking as though they're the norm is irresponsible and hurtful to the rest of the men and women in the world. I have friends who are fair-off, evenly employed regular joes, and they get more ass than a toilet seat.

Maybe that doc love should lose his virginity, it might force a personal paradigm shift. Then again, there might be no saving this schmuck.

quote:

---

The only truth from the article:
Just because she has gorgeous breasts and long legs on the outside, it doesn't mean she's marriage material.

Remember, guys, beauty is only skin deep but character is to the bone.

---

And Sage speaks the truth as well. The guy's an idiot.

"Hey, I'm attracted to good looking girls (ignoring their other qualities) and want to date them. But I can't figure out how they're attacted to good looking men while ignoring their other qualities, and want to date them."

[ 01-06-2002: Message edited by: Chalesm ]

Very good point, Chal. Nothing wrong with us 5's and 6's, but lots of men don't see it like that