EverCrest Message Forums
You are not logged in. Login or Register.
Author
Topic: Sex before Marriage
Mortious
Gluttonous Overlard
posted 10-29-2001 02:10:00 PM
Right or wrong? Moral objections? Religious objections?

Discuss.

Flame-bringers will be dipped in sulphuric acid.

Bloodsage
Heart Attack
posted 10-29-2001 02:12:00 PM
Yes, please.

To reign is worth ambition, though in Hell:
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.

--Satan, quoted by John Milton

Kekvit Irae
Pancake
posted 10-29-2001 02:13:00 PM
I, personally, have a problem with it if there is no love involved (love em and leave em). If you've been seeing him/her for awhile now and truely love him/her, I honestly see nothing wrong with it.
Then again, I'm under a self-inflicted Oath of Purity. No sex before marrage
Tarquinn
Personally responsible for the decline of the American Dollar
posted 10-29-2001 02:13:00 PM
quote:
Check out the big brain on Bloodsage!
Yes, please.


~Never underestimate the power of a Dark Clown.
Blindy
Roll for initiative, Monkey Boy!
posted 10-29-2001 02:14:00 PM
You shouldn't have sex with some one until you know that you have feelings for them as a person, not just as a sexual object. In other words, if you can't see yourself being able to love some one, don't sleep with them.
In my opinion, marrage should come before having children, but sex is essential for creating a lasting bond between two people, and I feel that it has it's place outside of marrage.
On a plane ride, the more it shakes,
The more I have to let go.
Karnaj
Road Warrior Queef
posted 10-29-2001 02:20:00 PM
It's fine, if you do it for the right reasons. If you abstain because you don't want pregancy/disease/spoil the fun, then power to you!

If you do it because you fear a horrible punishment will be wrought down upon you and your family by the Almighty Himself, then you're abstaining for the wrong reasons.

That's the American Dream: to make your life into something you can sell. - Chuck Palahniuk, Haunted

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite. - John Kenneth Galbraith



Beer.

Mightion Defensor
posted 10-29-2001 02:21:00 PM
I'd rather make love to a woman than phuck her. I'm really not interested in meaningless or casual sex.

I don't think I could make love to someone who didn't love me, and I didn't love.

Marriage is not a required part of the equation. I'll wait for marriage if I have to; I'd darn well better get some on my wedding night, though.

Bloodsage
Heart Attack
posted 10-29-2001 02:21:00 PM
Sex without love is only bad when one participant assumes it means more than the other.

As long as

a) everyone involved is of legal age
b) everyone involved has consented
c) everyone involved is uncommitted (or both partners are participating)
d) everyone involved practices safe sex

who cares?

That's the funny thing about guys: they want to date sluts and marry virgins. One wonders where the transition occurs. /boggle

{edit: out, out damned typo!}

[ 10-29-2001: Message edited by: Bloodsage ]

To reign is worth ambition, though in Hell:
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.

--Satan, quoted by John Milton

Elvish Crack Piper
Murder is justified so long as people believe in something different than you do
posted 10-29-2001 02:25:00 PM
I would guess the transition starts after they get out of the high school/college years mindset and actually think about life in a longterm way.
(Insert Funny Phrase Here)
Kanid
BANNED
posted 10-29-2001 02:26:00 PM
You can say you won't, that you want to wait, but sometimes when it is right there offered to you, the temptation is hard to resist.

I was 20 when I changed my mind about waiting till marriage. I was almost 22 when I first had sex.

Now, I've had sex, I've been married, I have kids, I'm getting divorced. I'm waiting until I get married again, if I ever do, to have sex.

When you are having sex, the physical attraction overrides much of the emotional, and you think you feel more than you really do. And once you start having sex, it is very hard to find a reason to stop.

Find someone you care for, fall truly in love with them without the physical animal desires overloading your brain, and then, when you are ready to spend the rest of your life with them, share the intimacy and fun of lovemaking with them.

But that's just my opinion.

Religiously, this made a lot of sense to me also : http://www.bible.com/answers/afornica.html

And some scary information here : So many problems in marriages today stem from the fact that young people are not virgins when they marry. They are bringing wounded emotions and diseased bodies into their marriages because of prior promiscuous affairs. STDs (Sexually Transmitted Diseases) are so widespread that the statistics are shocking. There are 12 million new cases of STDs annually in the United states and 67% of these occur among persons under the age of 25. In fact, every year one out of six teens contracts an STD. 100,000 to 150,000 women become infertile each year as a result of STDs. Others endure years of pain as some of these diseases are incurable. What a tragic price to pay for sexual sins.

[ 10-29-2001: Message edited by: Kanid ]

"Unlike adults, children have little need to deceive themselves." - Goethe
Happiness is subjective, subject yourself to it whenever possible.
"A man is not old until regrets take the place of dreams." - John Barrymore
Wise men still seek Him.
Maradon!
posted 10-29-2001 02:27:00 PM
Define marriage.

Is it a religious ceremony? Is it a matter of certificates and red tape?

Or is it a spiritual matter? A time where you know in your heart of hearts that you have found someone you would never leave, never hurt, always be with?

Sex before the first definition? I see no reason why not to.

Sex before the second definition? I see no reason why you'd want to.

Bloodsage
Heart Attack
posted 10-29-2001 02:31:00 PM
quote:
Maradon? had this to say about spermicidal lubricant:

Sex before the second definition? I see no reason why you'd want to.


I think Mortious means with someone else.

Why does sex have to have an emotional component? Granted, it's better when there is one, but it damn-sure doesn't suck (so to speak) when there isn't.

To reign is worth ambition, though in Hell:
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.

--Satan, quoted by John Milton

Trillee
I <3 My Deviant
posted 10-29-2001 02:31:00 PM
lessee... moved all the way from NY, to WA to live with a guy I met on the net *GASP!* heh never met him before, just took a gamble and flew out here. Well, that was almost 3 years ago, and we're happy, in love, and sexually active. We've talked about marrage a few times.. but like how things are. We feel we don't need a preist/ess or justice of the peace to tell us we're in love and husband and wife... our hearts tell us that. And to me that's all that matters... how your heart feels.
Blindy
Roll for initiative, Monkey Boy!
posted 10-29-2001 02:32:00 PM
quote:
Maradön? had this to say about Reading Rainbow:

Sex before the second definition? I see no reason why you'd want to.

People get tired of jerking off.

On a plane ride, the more it shakes,
The more I have to let go.
Mortious
Gluttonous Overlard
posted 10-29-2001 02:33:00 PM
Maradon: For me, marriage is a binding religious ceremony in the eyes of God.

I'm a Christian, but not a bible-basher. I'm the kind people don't mind

Elvish Crack Piper
Murder is justified so long as people believe in something different than you do
posted 10-29-2001 02:36:00 PM
I dunno about it anymore, I was in a Christian school till 7th grade, then moved to a town where church was something to sleep through. I dont know what is right and I think Blind Swordman pinged it.
(Insert Funny Phrase Here)
Kanid
BANNED
posted 10-29-2001 02:38:00 PM
quote:
Bloodsage had this to say about Robocop:
Why does sex have to have an emotional component? Granted, it's better when there is one, but it damn-sure doesn't suck (so to speak) when there isn't.

For some, myself included, sex is more than just the physical act of putting your parts together and moving until one or both of you orgasms.

It is a special thing, an intimate thing, shared between two people who care deeply enough for one another that they share this with each other, and no one else, for the rest of their lives.

"Unlike adults, children have little need to deceive themselves." - Goethe
Happiness is subjective, subject yourself to it whenever possible.
"A man is not old until regrets take the place of dreams." - John Barrymore
Wise men still seek Him.
Kekvit Irae
Pancake
posted 10-29-2001 02:41:00 PM
What Kanid said.
Bloodsage
Heart Attack
posted 10-29-2001 02:57:00 PM
quote:
Kanid wrote, obviously thinking to hard:
For some, myself included, sex is more than just the physical act of putting your parts together and moving until one or both of you orgasms.

It is a special thing, an intimate thing, shared between two people who care deeply enough for one another that they share this with each other, and no one else, for the rest of their lives.


Of course--and there's nothing wrong with that. But it's an arbitrary decision. It might as well be eating ice cream: sure, it's fun alone, but so much more so with someone you love.

That's why I'm asking.

What makes sex different, other than a slew of cultural/religious taboos that served a valid social purpose in the days before reliable birth control in paternal societies, but are largely irrelevant (logically speaking) now?

To reign is worth ambition, though in Hell:
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.

--Satan, quoted by John Milton

Trent
Smurfberry Moneyshot
posted 10-29-2001 02:59:00 PM
(nice new message icons there Drysart)

Sex before marriage.

I'm pretty much with Bloodsage.

quote:
Sex without love is only bad when one participant assumes it means more than the other.
As long as

a) everyone involved is of legal age
b) everyone involved has consented
c) everyone involved is uncommitted (or both partners are participating)
d) everyone involved practices safe sex


And that's IMO (and Bloodsages), not trying to make it anyone elses opnion.

Pesco
Is a copyright of Peachis. Don't underestimate his pants, either.
posted 10-29-2001 02:59:00 PM
Pesco shrugs.

I see no problem with it.

Bloodsage
Heart Attack
posted 10-29-2001 03:01:00 PM
I like the .sig, ImNotTrent . . . but you forgot, "Drink like someone else is buying."

To reign is worth ambition, though in Hell:
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.

--Satan, quoted by John Milton

Mod
Pancake
posted 10-29-2001 03:06:00 PM
quote:
Bloodsage had this to say about dark elf butts:
Why does sex have to have an emotional component? Granted, it's better when there is one, but it damn-sure doesn't suck (so to speak) when there isn't.

Dunno, for me it does. Probably has something to do with the fact that I'm quite shy IRL. As long as you protect yourself from diseases/pregnancies and you have fun it's fine. There are different types of sex, 'casual' sex that has the sole purpose of having 'fun', and the type kanid described. There's nothing wrong with either of them, things tend do get messy if people mistake one for the other though.

Life... is like a box of chocolates. A cheap, thoughtless, perfunctory gift that nobody ever asks for. Unreturnable, because all you get back is another box of chocolates. You're stuck with this undefinable whipped-mint crap that you mindlessly wolf down when there's nothing else left to eat. Sure, once in a while, there's a peanut butter cup, or an English toffee. But they're gone too fast, the taste is fleeting. So you end up with nothing but broken bits, filled with hardened jelly and teeth-crunching nuts, and if you're desperate enough to eat those, all you've got left is a... is an empty box... filled with useless, brown paper wrappers.
Mortious
Gluttonous Overlard
posted 10-29-2001 03:08:00 PM
quote:
Modrakien had this to say about Tron:
things tend do get messy

Uh huh...

Caanis Lupus
Rub me?
posted 10-29-2001 03:10:00 PM
The test drive before you buy.

Causal/one stands/rebound sex...not as good as in love with your partner sex IMO. Sex with your partner can be very beautiful...or...primal, depending on the mood The others can relieve stress or create more. As I started to realize that I was opening my eyes to how things were declining in the realtionship I was in, the sex became bland to the point she accused ME of cheating on her because I was not interested. But having that one night stand and being the freak you always wanted to be can be fun also. Of course ALWAYS use a condom...well that is if a guy is involve in the picture at any point. I guess lesbian/bi women just have to becareful if they are with a strange woman.

Also if you just have to have an affair...make sure you understand that they will find out. Guys/Gals that think they can get away with it are in for a shocker...the look on my ex's face when she decided to come "clean" about her little funtime she had been having with a coworker and I placed the time within a couple days of the start and end was priceless. Of course a little folding money loosened the other coworkers and her neighbors lips. Gotta love greed.


Edit: ack...don't ban me Points to the little msg icon.

[ 10-29-2001: Message edited by: Caanis Lupus ]

Katjya
Kelveron's Kitten
posted 10-29-2001 03:10:00 PM
I see no problem with sex before marriage. I never have and never will, even when it's my own children.

However, like Kanid and Kekvit and a number of other poster, I do feel that FOR ME, sex is only ... "right" when I'm in love with the person and they're in love with me. Of the very few men I've had sex with, I knew I loved them and all but two of them I thought, "Hey, I could easily see myself spending the rest of my life with this person."

Things didn't turn out that way, but I don't regret having slept with any of them.

Now, if someone else doesn't feel that sex should occur only in a relationship where the two people are in love, that's fine, as long as both parties understand that's where the relationship stands. Would I be disappointed if my some-day-to-be kids did this? Yeah, kinda. Would I belittle and berate them for it? Nope, not on your life. Because I feel this is a decision that needs to be made by each individual. /shrug

[ 10-29-2001: Message edited by: Katjya ]

Katjya Sylvertongue
Young Shadowknight and Proud Owner of her own (_|_)
Tarissa Treerunner
Mid-life Crisis Druid of House Avendur
Pesco
Is a copyright of Peachis. Don't underestimate his pants, either.
posted 10-29-2001 03:19:00 PM
I dont see how people question sex before marriage... if sex before marriage wasnt allowed... the human race wouldnt exist The law of nature: Control is to those that are the Strongest, Fastest, and Reproduce the most effiecently.

Anyway.... It is really just a challenge to yourself. A test of your will power I guess. I say dont fight it, just use good judgement. Dont go out and have wild sex with everyone, dats bad.. gets you in trouble. Wait for someone you truly want to be with, then by all means go for it. Sex isnt the only symbol of love, but spending the rest of your life with someone is.

Sex can mean alot of things... And shouldnt be used as a bonding point of marriage. Just make sure you and your partner are comfortable with it. And if you have choosen a husband/wife then dont do anything that will hurt them.

Kanid
BANNED
posted 10-29-2001 03:31:00 PM
Feel free to read the link I posted above.
"Unlike adults, children have little need to deceive themselves." - Goethe
Happiness is subjective, subject yourself to it whenever possible.
"A man is not old until regrets take the place of dreams." - John Barrymore
Wise men still seek Him.
BetaTested
Not gay, but loves the cock!
posted 10-29-2001 03:41:00 PM
Well, personally I think that sex before getting married isn't wrong. I'd be a hypocrite if I thought other wise.

Granted I can understand the position of Kanid. I respect him for that, his choice.

I'm all for sex, so long as the two parties are willing, go for it. ¬.¬ and yes if you were wondering I'm no virgin myself.

*Runs off to play FA now*


Got Xfire? Join me in the crusade to knock WoW from it's lofty #1 most played Xfire game with Solitare!
Kel
Pancake
posted 10-29-2001 03:42:00 PM
Sigh... the difficult questions, always the difficult questions.

For those of you who have decided on no sex before marriage, power and luck to you.

For those who stated love > marriage, I'm with you. Marriage is a contract. It's about making a promise to stick with one person for the rest of your life... and there are too many instances where people don't get that. I'd rather someone stuck with me because they truely care about me, rather than because they said they would and are honorable... .

On sex with vs. sex without love... no contest. I've done both... I've tried the without both knowing it and lying to myself about it. (Of course I love him, just because he makes me miserable all the time doesn't mean I don't love him...) Sex without love is a waste of time... at least masturbation guarantees an orgasm.

Or, bad sex is worse than no sex.

Do I have issues from past sexual relationships? Yes, but I have worse ones from past non-sexual relationships. Am I aware how lucky I've been never to have caught something (or someone)... yes, but part of that was being intelligent about my partners, regular medical screening and using protection. (Repeat with me: No sex until you get the lab results.)

Marriage is sacred... it's also a physical contract dealing with property rights and how they pass to children. It and love are really what you make of them.

On sex and religion: I refuse to use someone else's ancient logic. Give me a good reason using today's medical science and I'll listen.

Do you believe in fondue? You know you do.
If you look deep within your heart you will find... melted cheese.
Trent
Smurfberry Moneyshot
posted 10-29-2001 03:46:00 PM
quote:
Kel impressed everyone with:
On sex and religion: I refuse to use someone else's ancient logic. Give me a good reason using today's medical science and I'll listen.

Yes yes, that is what I was trying so hard to think of a nice way of saying.

*agrees with Kel*

Random Insanity Generator
Condom Ninja El Supremo
posted 10-29-2001 03:53:00 PM
On the subject, Been there. Done that. Don't care.

Personally, the first time I was involved with someone I was in love. It was someone I wanted to share my life with and I believed that was enough to justify it. I still believe this.

The second person I was involved with.... well... You'd think after 2 years you'd have gotten over being ripped apart. I was wrong. Plus it doesn't help that said individual couldn't make up her mind to save her ass. The frustration of having a bad day at work and your SO calling you up because she know's there's a gathering for your office at a local amusement park but she can't decide when to show up at your place is just beyond words.... "What time do you want me to show up?" "I get off work at 8, I should be home about 8:15... I'll want to split ASAP." "Ok.... so I should show up....?" ARGH.

*EDIT*

And on the last one above, I should point out the resolution of that one. I still find it amusing.

Said conversation occured a week before my b-day. She called later that night to cancel after I told her to make up her mind and I'll be home between 8:15 and 8:30. I come home on my b-day to see a present wrapped on the doorstep. Inside I find a rather nice display dagger. Gold and silver handle, celtic knotwork on the blade... really nice looking blade. I'll post a shot of it sometime. Along with the DAGGER, I find Dear John note, inside the B-Day card.

I'm still amused that I got a Dear John and a Dagger for my B-Day. I'm warped like that.

[ 10-29-2001: Message edited by: Random Insanity Generator ]

* NullDevice kicks the server. "Floggings will continue until processing power improves!"
-----------------------------------
"That was black magic, and it was easy to use. Easy and fun. Like Legos." -- Harry Dresden
-----------------------------------
That's what playing Ragnarok Online taught me: There's no problem in the universe that can't be resolved by the proper application of daggers to faces.
Lenlalron Flameblaster
posted 10-29-2001 06:21:00 PM
Well........

The bible says it's wrong. That's why pretty much, I don't. But there is another side to it, I guess.

Sex is pretty much the ultimate intimacy. Sex is where two people literally become one. It's kinda like marraige, except in a physical way.

Love is tricky. Emotions lie. Just because you feel happy dory right now doesn't mean that you should have sex. Will you feel the same love and care for that person 10 years from now? Unless you get married, no. And then, unfourtunately, even when you do get married, it doesn't work out.

Look, I doubt I can change anyone. I am well aware of all the people who believe that premarital sex is fine. Well, I have to live with it. But be sure that they really want to. People have their own reasons for doing stuff, and what they tell you may not be what they are really feeling.

The problem is that sex has lost its meaning. But that's a tangent.

But, if you do want to have premarital sex, why marry? I mean, sex is like marraige, as I said earlier, in the most basic concept. I mean, if you give yourself physically and not emotionally, why should you not commit emotionally. You just can't separate the physical and emotional level, or else we just become wild beasts.

Grammar is your enemy! - While being able to understand someone's sentences might seem like a good idea for a proper essay, complaining on a forum scarcely leaves time for such trivialities. Write fast! You're angry, grrr! Make that show, and forget about things like capital letters, punctuation, and verbs.
Maradon!
posted 10-29-2001 06:26:00 PM
I phrased my previous statement badly.

No, I don't think it's wrong to have purely sexual flings, or to sleep with girls that you're just "trying on for size".

However, purely sexual flings where there's little or no attraction always seemed to me very bad for all parties involved.

[ 10-29-2001: Message edited by: Maradön? ]

Bloodsage
Heart Attack
posted 10-29-2001 06:27:00 PM
Generic, gender-neutral, silly, beer-goggle quote of the day (unattributed):

Never been to bed with an ugly person, but I've woken up with a few!

{edit: P-C}

[ 10-29-2001: Message edited by: Bloodsage ]

To reign is worth ambition, though in Hell:
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.

--Satan, quoted by John Milton

Densetsu
NOT DRYSART
posted 10-29-2001 06:43:00 PM
quote:
Lenlalron had this to say about Pirotess:
Will you feel the same love and care for that person 10 years from now? Unless you get married, no. And then, unfourtunately, even when you do get married, it doesn't work out.

Your logic is flawed.
I was in the Virgin Islands once. I met a girl, we ate lobster, drank piña coladas. At sunset, we made love like sea otters. That was a pretty good day. Why couldn't I get that day over, and over?
Maradon!
posted 10-29-2001 06:49:00 PM
quote:
Lenlalron impressed everyone with:
The bible says it's wrong.

The bible was written and interpreted by humans as fallable you and I.

Bloodsage
Heart Attack
posted 10-29-2001 06:52:00 PM
quote:
Maradön? had this to say about Reading Rainbow:
The bible was written and interpreted by humans as fallable you and I.

fallible . . . you and me . . .

Given the context, that's a riot! You couldn't have planned it any better than that.

To reign is worth ambition, though in Hell:
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.

--Satan, quoted by John Milton

Lenlalron Flameblaster
posted 10-29-2001 06:56:00 PM
quote:
Densetsu impressed everyone with:
[QUOTE]Lenlalron had this to say about Pirotess:
[qb]Will you feel the same love and care for that person 10 years from now? Unless you get married, no. And then, unfourtunately, even when you do get married, it doesn't work out.


Your logic is flawed.[/QB][/QUOTE]

Crap. I meant 'sometimes, it doesn't work out'.

Relationships of a loving nature without marraige generally don't last that long.
Some probably do, but that's at best rare I think.

Oh, I'm not trying to insinuate that if you have sex you have to get married. It's just a thought.

Grammar is your enemy! - While being able to understand someone's sentences might seem like a good idea for a proper essay, complaining on a forum scarcely leaves time for such trivialities. Write fast! You're angry, grrr! Make that show, and forget about things like capital letters, punctuation, and verbs.
Lenlalron Flameblaster
posted 10-29-2001 06:59:00 PM
quote:
Maradön? had this to say about Optimus Prime:
The bible was written and interpreted by humans as fallable you and I.

I'm not trying to get on a Bible tangent here. The Bible does say that it is wrong, and I believe in the bible, hence, I believe it is wrong. If the Bible's wrong, and we meet up in the extra-dimensional plane or something or other we call the after life, nothing like the Bible says, you can laugh at me.

But, anyway, your beliefs, your thing.

Grammar is your enemy! - While being able to understand someone's sentences might seem like a good idea for a proper essay, complaining on a forum scarcely leaves time for such trivialities. Write fast! You're angry, grrr! Make that show, and forget about things like capital letters, punctuation, and verbs.
All times are US/Eastern
Hop To: